Abstract
This article analyses the methodological apparatus set forth by O. G. Oexle, in his mainlystudies Oexle’s works entitled L’historisme en debat: de Nietzsche a Kantorowicz, Krise desHistorismus, Krise der Wirklichkeit, and Das Problem der Problemgeschichte. This paperemphasizes the development of Oexle’s methodology, its theoretical implications and itsapplicability in the Latin American context. The consequences of this methodology for thesocial and natural sciences in contemporary academy remain of vital importance for thispaper.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have