Abstract
Bodily mimesis, the capacity to use the body representationally, was one of the key innovations that allowed early humans to go beyond the ‘baseline’ of generalized ape communication and cognition. We argue that the original human-specific communication afforded by bodily mimesis was based on signs that involve three entities: an expression that represents an object (i.e. communicated content) for an interpreter. We further propose that the core component of this communication, pantomime, was able to transmit referential information that was not limited to select semantic domains or the ‘here-and-now’, by means of motivated—most importantly iconic—signs. Pressures for expressivity and economy then led to conventionalization of signs and a growth of linguistic characteristics: semiotic systematicity and combinatorial expression. Despite these developments, both naturalistic and experimental data suggest that the system of pantomime did not disappear and is actively used by modern humans. Its contemporary manifestations, or pantomimic fossils, emerge when language cannot be used, for instance when people do not share a common language, or in situations where the use of (spoken) language is difficult, impossible or forbidden. Under such circumstances, people bootstrap communication by means of pantomime and, when these circumstances persist, newly emergent pantomimic communication becomes increasingly language-like.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Reconstructing prehistoric languages’.
Highlights
Mimesis, the capacity to use the body representationally, was one of the key innovations that allowed early humans to go beyond the ‘baseline’ of generalized ape communication and cognition
We suggest that the cognitive ability that was responsible for the emergence of the original sign-based communication in human evolution (§2a) continues in modern humans and is put to work under special conditions
In line with mimesis theory, we understand this original communication system as pantomime, characterized by mimetic communication based on primary iconicity and refer to its modern manifestations as pantomimic fossils
Summary
A great many introductions to language evolution begin by highlighting the truism that ‘language does not fossilise’ This is only truistic in its literal sense, and Derek Bickerton [1]) observes that ‘there may exist contemporary phenomena— living linguistic fossils ... We suggest that the cognitive ability (roughly equivalent to bodily mimesis) that was responsible for the emergence of the original sign-based communication in human evolution (§2a) continues in modern humans and is put to work under special conditions. These include situations when people are unable to use language, despite retaining the motivational, cognitive and motor capacities for sharing referential meaning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.