Pannexin1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism and Platelet Reactivity in a Cohort of Cardiovascular Patients.

The only reason P2Y12 inhibitors are administered in addition to aspirin is to improve the prevention of thrombosis. The clinical efficacy of adding clopidogrel to aspirin as a secondary prevention strategy in patients with high-risk coronary artery disease is well established.1 There are no effects of clopidogrel on any receptor other than P2Y12 to explain the magnitude of the clinical benefit. All of the established clinical effects are attributed to reduced platelet responsiveness to ADP.2 Therefore, the patient with inadequate P2Y12 inhibition determined by ex vivo testing logically has an increased risk for thrombosis. Persistent ischemic event occurrence and the irrefutable demonstration of clopidogrel antiplatelet response variability are 2 potent arguments against the widely practiced nonselective or one-size-fits-all strategy of administering clopidogrel therapy. Observational studies conducted in thousands of patients have led to an international consensus that high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) to ADP is a major risk factor for post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ischemic event occurrence.3,4 Moreover, the recent 2011 American and European guidelines have given a Class IIb recommendation for platelet function testing or genotyping if the results of testing may alter management.5–7 Furthermore, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons gave a Class IIb recommendation for platelet function testing to determine the timing of surgery in patients on clopidogrel therapy (Level of Evidence C).8 These recommendations for personalizing antiplatelet therapy are unprecedented and acknowledge that a large body of data has accrued demonstrating the relation of HPR to ischemic risk in the PCI-treated patient. Finally, the evidence of diminished effectiveness of clopidogrel in poor metabolizers (those having 2 loss-of-function [LoF] cytochrome P450 [ CYP ] 2C19 alleles) has been recognized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) boxed warning about treatment with clopidogrel.9 Response by Krishna …

After injury to the blood vessel, platelets adhere to the exposed subendothelium by a process (adhesion) that involves the interaction of a plasma protein, von Willebrand factor (vWF), and a specific protein on the platelet surface, glycoprotein Ib (GPIb; the Figure⇓). Adhesion is followed by recruitment of additional platelets that form clumps, a process called aggregation (cohesion). This involves binding of fibrinogen to specific platelet surface receptors—a complex comprising glycoproteins IIb-IIIa (GPIIb-IIIa). Activated platelets release the contents of their granules (secretion or release reaction), such as ADP and serotonin from dense granules, which subsequently cause recruitment of additional platelets. In addition, platelets play a major role in coagulation mechanisms; several key enzymatic reactions occur on the platelet membrane–lipoprotein surface. A number of physiological agonists interact with specific receptors on the platelet surface to induce responses, including a change in platelet shape from discoid to spherical, aggregation, secretion, and thromboxane A2 (TxA2) production. Other agonists such as prostacyclin inhibit these responses. Ligation of the platelet receptors initiates the production or release of several intracellular messenger molecules, including Ca2+ ions, products of phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis by phospholipase C (PLC; diacylglycerol [DG] and inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate [InsP3]), TxA2, and cyclic nucleotides (cAMP; the Figure⇓). These subsequently induce or modulate the various platelet responses of Ca2+ mobilization, protein phosphorylation, aggregation, secretion, and liberation of arachidonic acid. The interaction between the agonist receptors and the key intracellular effector enzymes (eg, PLA2, PLC, adenylyl cyclase) is mediated by a group of GTP-binding proteins that are modulated by GTP. As in most secretory cells, platelet activation results in …

<i>Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions</i> Editors’ Picks

The prognostic value of multiple electrode aggregometry and light transmittance aggregometry in stable cardiovascular patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The study aimed to evaluate antiplatelet drug responsiveness in stable outpatients with cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and examine whether impaired antiplatelet drug responsiveness is associated with worse clinical outcomes in this population. Stable cardiovascular patients (n = 771) were enrolled at least one month after an acute ischemic atherothrombotic event. Antiplatelet drug responsiveness was assessed with specific assays (serum TxA2 for aspirin, the VASP assay for clopidogrel) and other aggregation-based assays using different agonists. All patients were followed until the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event. The 133 CKD patients were found to have higher activity of von Willebrand factor and higher fibrinogen levels. After a median follow-up of 33 months, 88 events occurred in patients without CKD and 31 events in patients with CKD (5.0 events and 8.7 events per 100 patient years, respectively, HR = 1.75 (95% CI 1.16–2.63; p = 0.008). The prevalence of poor aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness and high platelet reactivity as assessed with different aggregation-based assays was similar in patients with estimated GFR ≥ 60 ml/min, 45–59 ml/min, and < 45 ml/min. No significant interaction for CKD vs. non-CKD was observed for events occurrence in patients with or without high platelet reactivity on several assays, with the exception of collagen-induced aggregation. In stable cardiovascular patients, CKD is not associated with higher platelet reactivity. Decreased antiplatelet drug responsiveness is not associated with worse clinical outcomes in CKD patients.

Pannexin1 (Panx1) forms ATP channels that play a critical role in the immune response by reinforcing purinergic signal amplification in the immune synapse. Platelets express Panx1 and given the importance of ATP release in platelets, we investigated Panx1 function in platelet aggregation and the potential impact of genetic polymorphisms on Panx1 channels. We show here that Panx1 forms ATP release channels in human platelets and that inhibiting Panx1 channel function with probenecid, mefloquine or specific (10)Panx1 peptides reduces collagen-induced platelet aggregation but not the response induced by arachidonic acid or ADP. These results were confirmed using Panx1-/- platelets. Natural variations have been described in the human Panx1 gene, which are predicted to induce non-conservative amino acid substitutions in its coding sequence. Healthy subjects homozygous for Panx1-400C, display enhanced platelet reactivity in response to collagen compared with those bearing the Panx1-400A allele. Conversely, the frequency of Panx1-400C homozygotes was increased among cardiovascular patients with hyper-reactive platelets compared with patients with hypo-reactive platelets. Exogenous expression of polymorphic Panx1 channels in a Panx-deficient cell line revealed increased basal and stimulated ATP release from cells transfected with Panx1-400C channels compared with Panx1-400A expressing transfectants. In conclusion, we demonstrate a specific role for Panx1 channels in the signalling pathway leading to collagen-induced platelet aggregation. Our study further identifies for the first time an association between a Panx1-400A>C genetic polymorphism and collagen-induced platelet reactivity. The Panx1-400C variant encodes for a gain-of-function channel that may adversely affect atherothrombosis by specifically enhancing collagen-induced ATP release and platelet aggregation.

Background Several platelet-derived microRNAs are associated with platelet reactivity (PR) and clinical outcome in cardiovascular patients. We previously showed an association between miR-204-5p and PR in stable cardiovascular patients, but data on functional mechanisms are lacking.Aims To validate miR-204-5p as a regulator of PR in platelet-like structures (PLS) derived from human megakaryocytes and to address mechanistic issues.Methods Human hematopoietic stem cells were differentiated into megakaryocytes, enabling the transfection of miR-204-5p and the recovery of subsequent PLS. The morphology of transfected megakaryocytes and PLS was characterized using flow cytometry and microscopy. The functional impact of miR-204-5p was assessed using a flow assay, the quantification of the activated form of the GPIIbIIIa receptor, and a fibrinogen-binding assay. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot were used to evaluate the impact of miR-204-5p on a validated target, CDC42. The impact of CDC42 modulation was investigated using a silencing strategy.Results miR-204-5p transfection induced cytoskeletal changes in megakaryocytes associated with the retracted protrusion of proPLS, but it had no impact on the number of PLS released. Functional assays showed that the PLS produced by megakaryocytes transfected with miR-204-5p were more reactive than controls. This phenotype is mediated by the regulation of GPIIbIIIa expression, a key contributor in platelet–fibrinogen interaction. Similar results were obtained after CDC42 silencing, suggesting that miR-204-5p regulates PR, at least in part, via CDC42 downregulation.Conclusion We functionally validated miR-204-5p as a regulator of the PR that occurs through CDC42 downregulation and regulation of fibrinogen receptor expression.

028 Prevalence and characteristics of dual non responsiveness to aspirin and clodiprogel in a cohort of 430 stable cardiovascular patients. Insight from the adrie study on stable cardiovascular patients

Antagonism of prostaglandin-mediated responses in platelets and vascular smooth muscle by 13-azaprostanoic acid analogs: Evidence for selective blockade of thromboxane A 2 responses

A NOD/SCID mouse model for the assessment of human platelet aggregation in vivo

Several studies have indicated that approximately 25 % of patients treated with aspirin exhibit high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), which is potentially associated with cardiovascular events (CVEs). However, this association is still controversial, since the mechanisms by which HTPR contributes to CVEs remain unclear and a no standardised definition of HTPR has been established. To determine whether HTPR is associated with CVE recurrence and what type of assay would best predict CVE recurrence, we conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study of 592 stable cardiovascular outpatients treated with aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention. Their HTPR was determined by arachidonic acid- or collagen-induced aggregation assays using two different agonist concentrations. Residual cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 activity was assessed by measuring serum thromboxane (TX)B2 or urinary 11-dehydro TXB2. Shear-induced platelet thrombus formation was also examined. We followed all patients for two years to evaluate how these seven indexes were related to the recurrence of CVEs (cerebral infarction, transient ischaemic attack, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularisation, other arterial thrombosis, or cardiovascular death). Of 583 patients eligible for the analysis, CVEs occurred in 69 (11.8 %). A Cox regression model identified several classical risk factors associated with CVEs. However, neither HTPR nor high residual COX-1 activity was significantly associated with CVEs, even by applying cut-off values suggested in previous reports or a receiver-operating characteristic analysis. In conclusion, recurrence of CVEs occurred independently of HTPR and residual COX-1 activity. Thus, our findings do not support the use of platelet or COX-1 functional testing for predicting clinical outcomes in stable cardiovascular patients.

A series of reports in 2007 established that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 9p21.3 locus are associated with coronary heart disease (CHD), both in patients with acute myocardial infarction and chronic atherosclerosis.1,–,4 Subsequently, many additional studies used a candidate locus approach to replicate the 9p21.3-CHD association. Intriguingly, other phenotypes have also been found to be associated with this genomic region, including type II diabetes, stroke, malignant melanoma, aortic aneurysms, cerebral aneurysms, and periodontitis. Unfortunately, neither the causative variants nor genes have been established. Although genetic associations may permit better disease risk stratification, without the knowledge of the genes and variants we lose opportunities to improve our basic understanding of the disease process and hence the potential for targeted therapies. Article see p 445 Many cellular pathways in multiple tissues contribute to the pathogenic processes resulting in CHD. There is value in using intermediate phenotypes as outcomes in genetic association studies because there is enhanced power to detect gene associations when the number of genes potentially responsible for the phenotype is reduced, thereby increasing the fraction of the variance explained by any single factor or gene. In addition, intermediate traits are usually easier to define (have less heterogeneity) than clinical disease. Somewhat surprisingly, 9p21.3 has not been associated with measures believed to represent the chronic process of atherosclerosis or endothelial cell reactivity,5 suggesting that this locus may contribute to CHD by an alternate pathophysiologic mechanism. There is abundant pathological and clinical evidence demonstrating the vital role played by blood platelets in acute coronary syndromes, which result from the formation of occlusive platelet thrombi in coronary arteries at the sites of ruptured atherosclerotic plaques,6,7 and antiplatelet agents have become a mainstay of therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes. In addition to …

Impact of Anemia on Platelet Response to Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Stenting

Molecular mechanisms of platelet activation.

High postclopidogrel platelet reactivity in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with stenting: a clue for adverse prognosis?