Abstract

Pandemic surveillance raises established ethical questions in a new and urgent context at the juncture of information ethics, research ethics, and public health. This chapter explores how such surveillance implicates the values of privacy, fairness, transparency, and accountability (common themes in information ethics) as well as the values of autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence, and justice (central themes in research ethics). In particular, three insights from these fields can help guide the use of surveillance technology: privacy is instrumental, not absolute; privacy has both individual and social significance; and third-party, democratic decision-making and oversight is critical in the process of balancing competing values and addressing ethical issues raised by pandemic surveillance. These insights are necessary for balancing the tensions between the social goods of privacy and public health while handling networked and highly sensitive health information.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.