Abstract

The relationships of crustaceans and hexapods (Pancrustacea) have been much discussed and partially elucidated following the emergence of phylogenomic data sets. However, major uncertainties still remain regarding the position of iconic taxa such as Branchiopoda, Copepoda, Remipedia, and Cephalocarida, and the sister group relationship of hexapods. We assembled the most taxon-rich phylogenomic pancrustacean data set to date and analyzed it using a variety of methodological approaches. We prioritized low levels of missing data and found that some clades were consistently recovered independently of the analytical approach used. These include, for example, Oligostraca and Altocrustacea. Substantial support was also found for Allotriocarida, with Remipedia as the sister of Hexapoda (i.e., Labiocarida), and Branchiopoda as the sister of Labiocarida, a clade that we name Athalassocarida (=”nonmarine shrimps”). Within Allotriocarida, Cephalocarida was found as the sister of Athalassocarida. Finally, moderate support was found for Hexanauplia (Copepoda as sister to Thecostraca) in alliance with Malacostraca. Mapping key crustacean tagmosis patterns and developmental characters across the revised phylogeny suggests that the ancestral pancrustacean was relatively short-bodied, with extreme body elongation and anamorphic development emerging later in pancrustacean evolution.

Highlights

  • The rapid advancement in DNA sequencing technology has led to major changes in our understanding of crustacean relationships and evolution

  • We present a phylogenomic investigation of Pancrustacea based on two new molecular matrices derived using transcriptomic and genomic data from 140 species, 125 of them being pancrustaceans

  • We have built two molecular matrices based on different orthology assignment strategies and shown that the matrix based on the selection of single-copy and slowly evolving genes is less affected by substitution saturation, previously found as a major confounding factor in deep-phylogenetic studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The rapid advancement in DNA sequencing technology has led to major changes in our understanding of crustacean relationships and evolution. Twenty years ago, conflicting morphology-based classification schemes existed, all of which did not recognize that hexapods are nothing but terrestrial ß The Author(s) 2019. Doi:10.1093/gbe/evz Advance Access publication July 4, 2019 Evol. 11(8):2055–2070. doi:10.1093/gbe/evz Advance Access publication July 4, 2019

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.