Abstract
It has been claimed that the ideas contained in the panbiogeographic methodology and synthesis of Croizat (1952-1964) have been greatly extended to result in the vicariance cladistic approach to the study of historical biogeography (Sneath, 1982:213; also Patterson, 1981a, b). Both Craw (1982) and Croizat (1982) have argued that panbiogeography and vicariance cladistics are distinctive and rival research programs. A recent insightful analysis of the nature of branching diagrams or cladograms (Nelson and Platnick, 1981) offers a means of comparing these contradictory views.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
