Abstract

The New Zealand conifers (20 species of trees and shrubs in the Araucariaceae, Podocarpaceae and Cupressaceae) are often regarded as ancient Gondwanan elements, but mostly originated much later. Often thought of as tall trees of humid, warm forests, they are present throughout in alpine shrublands, tree lines, bogs, swamps, and in dry, frost-prone regions. The tall conifers rarely form purely coniferous forest and mostly occur as an emergent stratum above evergreen angiosperm trees. During Maori settlement in the 13th century, these fire-sensitive trees succumbed rapidly, most of the drier forests being lost. As these were also the more conifer-rich forests, ecological research has been skewed towards conifer dynamics of forests wetter and cooler than the pre-human norm. Conifers are well represented in the pollen record and we here we review their late Quaternary history in the light of what is known about their current ecology with the intention of countering this bias. During glacial episodes, all trees were scarce south of c. 40°S, and extensive conifer-dominant forest was confined to the northern third of the North Island. Drought- and cold-resistant Halocarpus bidwillii and Phyllocladus alpinus formed widespread scrub in the south. During the deglacial, beginning 18,000 years ago, tall conifers underwent explosive spread to dominate the forest biomass throughout. Conifer dominance lessened in favour of angiosperms in the wetter western lowland forests over the Holocene but the dryland eastern forests persisted largely unchanged until settlement. Mid to late Holocene climate change favoured the more rapidly growing Nothofagaceae which replaced the previous conifer-angiosperm low forest or shrubland in tree line ecotones and montane areas. The key to this dynamic conifer history appears to be their bimodal ability to withstand stress, and dominate on poor soils and in cool, dry regions but, in wetter, warmer locations, to slowly grow thorough competing broadleaves to occupy an exposed, emergent stratum where their inherent stress resistance ensures little effective angiosperm competition.

Highlights

  • In 1935, Lucy Cranwell—a young New Zealand researcher attending the VI International Botanical Congress in Amsterdam—was invited to work with Lennart von Post on the pollen analysis of peat sequences collected from southern New Zealand by the Swedish glaciologist Carl Caldenius (Cameron, 2000)

  • Dense tall conifer forest had occupied all but the driest eastern districts of the North Island and extensive stands were present in the lowland South Island throughout

  • An outline of the ecological niche of the conifers has been given in Table 1, and in Table 2 we summarize how the changing climate and seasonality over a glacial-interglacial cycle has shifted the distribution of broadly defined conifer vegetation groupings

Read more

Summary

Palynology and the Ecology of the New Zealand Conifers

During Maori settlement in the thirteenth century, fire-sensitive trees succumbed rapidly, most of the drier forests being lost As these were the more conifer-rich forests, ecological research has been skewed toward conifer dynamics of forests wetter and cooler than the pre-human norm. Mid to late Holocene climate change favored the more rapidly growing Nothofagaceae which replaced the previous conifer-angiosperm low forest or shrubland in tree line ecotones and montane areas. The key to this dynamic conifer history appears to be their bimodal ability to withstand stress, and dominate on poor soils and in cool, dry regions but, in wetter, warmer locations, to slowly grow thorough competing broadleaves to occupy an exposed, emergent stratum where their inherent stress resistance ensures little effective angiosperm competition

INTRODUCTION
Prumnopitys taxifolia*
Last Glacial Maximum
The Holocene
Past distribution
Widespread during LGM in NI
The Mid to Late Holocene
Late Holocene and Polynesian Fire
Ecological Niche
Conifers and Drylands
Conifers and the Nothofagaceae
NEW ZEALAND CONIFERS FROM A GLOBAL BIOGEOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE
Adaptation and Historical Contingency
Vacant Tree Niches?
ARE PALYNOLOGY AND ECOLOGY MUTUALLY SUPPORTIVE?
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.