Palm versus soybean oil on intestinal recovery from malnutrition in Guinea pigs.

Abstract

Recent recommendations on feeding malnourished children do not provide indication on the nature of dietary lipids. Our aim was to compare the effect of palm oil (mainly saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids) and soybean oil (mainly polyunsaturated fatty acids) on the recovery from malnutrition in guinea pigs. In a first experiment, guinea pigs received a balanced (control group) or a maize (malnourished group) diet for 7, 12, and 21 d. In a second experiment, after 12 d of malnutrition, guinea pigs received a rehabilitation diet containing palm or soybean oil. Both rehabilitation diets allowed a partial recovery from the severe weight loss induced by malnutrition. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances content, measured in intestinal homogenates, increased in malnourished guinea pigs compared with control animals (40%, p < 0.05) and returned to near control values after rehabilitation with palm (10%) but not soybean (43%) oil diet. Intestinal short-circuit current, assessed in jejunal segments mounted in Ussing chambers, increased progressively during malnutrition (p < 0.001) and returned to near control values with both rehabilitation diets. Compared with control animals, the cell turnover (Ki-67 index assessed by immunohistochemistry detection of the Ki-67 antigen) decreased after soybean (-60%, p < 0.01) but not after palm oil. These results confirm that experimental polydeficient malnutrition induces oxidative stress and dysfunction in the intestine. They show a differential effect of palm and soybean oil on these intestinal measurements, suggesting that the composition of dietary lipids may be important in the treatment of malnutrition.