Abstract

Threats to food security have increased around the world following the increasing threat of climate change over the last few years. Such threats have also become apparent in Southeast Asia. This region is home to 10% of the world's population and is host to the world's largest rice and palm oil exporters. Malaysia and Indonesia play an important role in securing the future supplies of palm oil because these two countries account for 85% of global palm oil production. However, the impact of climate change may cause a food crisis in the future, thus raising the possibility of food losses in the region. This paper is an attempt to revisit the position of Malaysia and Indonesia in Southeast Asia with a particular emphasis on the two countries' role in countering future food crises. It is argued that the current economic relation policies of Malaysia and Indonesia have somewhat neglected the importance of future food security in Southeast Asia. The idea of establishing a council for palm oil producers between the two countries is seen as a ‘game changer'. However, the effect of such an effort is uncertain, and it pays little attention to the need for securing Southeast Asia's future food system. The council needs to commit to moving beyond a ‘revenue driven' rationale. Concerning a regional engagement approach, stronger economic relations between Malaysia and Indonesia can be attributable to a more resilient food system in Southeast Asia. Keywords: Malaysia, Indonesia, palm oil, bilateralism & Southeast Asia

Highlights

  • Food production plays an important role in Southeast Asia’s regional stability

  • This paper attempts to clarify how the Malaysian and Indonesian governments can address the issue of future food security, with a particular emphasis on the two countries’ response to the rising demand for sustainable palm oil production

  • These schemes are reactions by Malaysia and Indonesia to adhere to the palm oil sustainability principles regulated under the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), Which was constructed as a ‘stakeholder initiative’, private actors who share universal environmental principles in palm oil production (Pye, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Food production plays an important role in Southeast Asia’s regional stability. In addition to recent issues in the ASEAN economic community, many believe that it is hard to foresee the scope of the potential crisis of food security in Southeast Asia. This ‘tax war’ between the two biggest palm oil producers indicates that Malaysia and Indonesia share common goals, namely, an aspiration to be the key player in the global palm oil market This zero-tariff policy had a somewhat positive response, with the price of CPO increasing steadily in both countries since the end of 2014. ISPO and MSPO are often perceived as a response to the growing demand for sustainable palm oil These schemes are reactions by Malaysia and Indonesia to adhere to the palm oil sustainability principles regulated under the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), Which was constructed as a ‘stakeholder initiative’, private actors (end-users, producers and NGOs) who share universal environmental principles in palm oil production (Pye, 2016).

Conclusion
Findings
Methods
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.