Pallidal versus subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Meige syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundGlobus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) are two common deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets. This meta-analysis was to compared the efficacy and safety of these two DBS targets for the treatment of Meige syndrome (MS). MethodsA systematic search was performed using EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify DBS trials for MS. Review Manager 5.3 was used to perform meta-analysis and the mean difference (MD) was analyzed and calculated with a random effect model. Pearson's correlation coefficients and meta-regression analyses were utilized to identify relevant predictive markers. ResultsTwenty trials involving 188 participants with GPi-DBS and 110 individuals with STN-DBS were eligible. Both groups showed improvement of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale-Movement (BFMDRS-M) and Disability (BFMDRS-D) scores (BFMDRS-M: MD = 10.57 [7.74–13.41] for GPi-DBS, and MD = 8.59 [4.08–13.11] for STN-DBS; BFMDRS-D: MD = 5.96 [3.15–8.77] for GPi-DBS, and MD = 4.71 [1.38–8.04] for STN-DBS; all P < 0.001) from baseline to the final follow-up, while no notable disparity in improvement rates was observed between them. Stimulation-related complications occurrence was also similar between two groups (38.54 ± 24.07% vs. 43.17 ± 29.12%, P = 0.7594). Simultaneously, preoperative BFMDRS-M score and disease duration were positively connected with the relative changes in BFMDRS-M score at the final visit. ConclusionBoth GPi-DBS and STN-DBS are effective MS therapies, with no differences in efficacy or the frequency of stimulation-related problems. Higher preoperative scores and longer disease duration probably predict greater improvement.