Abstract

The TerraneChrone ® (LA-ICP-MS) technique has been applied to carry out an integrated study of detrital zircons in sandstones sampled from the basal horizons of the stratotypical Riphean sequence in the Southern Urals, specifically the Navysh and Chudin suites of the Ai Formation of the Burzyan Group in the Bashkir Uplift. The concentrations of trace elements in the detrital zircons suggest that the role of oceanic or marginal-marine complexes among the primary sources of zircons was insignificant, and show a better agreement with the intra-continental rather than passive-margin origin of the Riphean basin, whose basal levels are composed by the Ai Formation. The U/Pb ages of zircons from samples K13-206 and M08-16-1 are generally similar: the Paleoproterozoic zircons predominate (the dominant peaks are actually coincident, 2063 and 2055 Ma), and only a few grains of the Archean age are present. Despite the similar U/Pb ages of the detrital zircons, these two samples considerably differ in their Hf isotopic features and the concentrations of trace elements, which means that the zircons in the studied sandstones are of different geodynamic origin. The characteristics of these zircons can be explained by a model showing the Ai Formation in the Navysh graben that is a rift structure and a predecessor of the Kama-Belaya aulacogene in the inner Volga-Ural region of the Paleoproterozoic supercontinent Columbia. At the initial stage of rifting, the granitoid complexes with a lower total silicic acidity, which composed the graben walls, had been eroded; as a result of erosion, coarse clastic rocks accumulated within the Navysh graben and formed the Navysh suite. A specific “carbonatitic” complex containing zircons (about 2.0, 2.5, 2.85 and 3.6 Ga) and the Palaeoarchean crustal material in the substrate of their parent rocks was also eroded. In the final stage of rifting, already at the initial stages of the development of the Kama-Belaya aulacogen (Chudin suite), the erosion products from the paleo-aquifers occupying vast areas began to be transported into the rift. The primary sources of clastics for the Chudin suite were both granitoids of the lower and normal silicic acidity. Besides, a specific “carbonatitic” complex containing juvenile zircons (about 2.05 Ga) was eroded. However, by that time, significant areas of the Archaean basement of the Volga-Ural region might have become hidden underneath a proto-cover and thus not eroded, so the Archean detritus in the Chudin suite is poorly represented in comparison with the Navysh suite, considering both the amounts and ages of detrital zircons. As of today, the Precambrian carbonatite rocks within both the Taratash complex (composing the basement of the Navysh graben) and the southeastern segment of the East-European Platform have not yet been described. The source of the “carbonatite” zircons remains unknown and can be discovered as more and more data on the basement rocks is accumulated.

Highlights

  • Rocks accumulated within the Navysh graben and formed the Navysh suite

  • In the final stage of rifting, already at the initial stages of the development of the Kama‐Belaya aulacogen (Chudin suite), the erosion products from the paleo‐aquifers occupying vast areas began to be transported into the rift

  • By that time, significant areas of the Archaean basement of the Volga‐Ural region might have become hidden underneath a proto‐cover and not eroded, so the Archean detritus in the Chudin suite is poorly represented in comparison with the Navysh suite, considering both the amounts and ages of detrital zircons

Read more

Summary

ВВЕДЕНИЕ

На юге Западного Урала расположен обширный выход докембрийских пород (рис. 1), описываемый обычно как Башкирский антиклинорий [Puchkov, 2010; Maslov, 2004]. Geological scheme (б): 1 – Late Paleozoic complexes of the Pre‐Ural marginal trough; 2–6 – Precambrian and Paleozoic complexes of the West Ural megazone: 2 – fauna‐characterized Paleozoic strata, 3–8 – Lower Paleozoic and Precambrian complexes of the Bashkir Uplift: 3 – Upper Vendian – Cambrian Asha group, 4–8 – Riphean strata of the stratotype area: 4 – Upper Riphean (Karatau group), 5 – Middle Riphean (Jurmat group); 6–8 – Lower Riphean (Burzyan group): 6 – Bakal formation, 7 – Satka formation, 8 – Ai formation; 9 – Early Precambrian metamorphic rocks (Taratash complex); – unevenly metamorphosed Paleozoic and pre‐Palaeozoic complexes in the uplift located at the eastern side of the Bashkir anticlinorium and Uraltau; – Early and Middle Paleozoic complexes of the East Ural megazone and mar‐ ginal allochthons (Kraki and Tirlyian); – faults: a – disturbing the internal structure of the regional tectonic elements; б – bordering the tectonic units within the Uraltau zone; – large thrusts and overthrusts; – structural lines: a – boundaries of the rock groups, for‐ mations, suites and strata within the complexes; б –positions of the Kukkarauk conglomerates within the field of development of the Asha rocks; – sampling sites and their numbers This scheme uses the data from V.I. Kozlov’s small‐scale geological map (Ufa sheet) and figures in [Puchkov, 2010; Keller, Chumakov, 1983; Kuznetsov et al, 2013, 2014a].

ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ ВЫДЕЛЕНИЯ ДЕТРИТОВЫХ ЦИРКОНОВ
АНАЛИЗ СОДЕРЖАНИЯ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ‐ПРИМЕСЕЙ
ОБСУЖДЕНИЕ И ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ ПОЛУЧЕННЫХ
ГЕОДИНАМИЧЕСКАЯ И ПАЛЕОГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКАЯ
10. ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ
Findings
11. БЛАГОДАРНОСТИ
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call