Abstract
Abstract Paleomagnetic measurements were conducted on Datong volcanic rocks from China, which are thought to have formed in the mid to early Brunhes Chron. Meaningful site-mean paleodirections were obtained from 21 sites which are considered to represent 17 independent cooling units. They give a mean VGP (virtual geomagnetic pole) position of (76.5°N, 7.9°E) with A95=7.7° (N=17), which is statistically distinct from geographic north. This dataset also yields an ASD (angular standard deviation) of 17.2° around the mean VGP position. Because the paleodirections form two clusters, the samples may record the paleomagnetic field during two different short periods and therefore may not average out paleosecular variation. Paleointensity measurements were conducted using three different methods. The DHT and LTD-DHT Shaw methods, the Thellier method, and the microwave Thellier method were applied to 119, 29 and 73 specimens respectively, and they give 66, 16 and 12 successful results (success rates are 55, 55 and 16%). From the LTD-DHT Shaw dataset, eight acceptable site-mean paleointensities are obtained. They give an average VDM (virtual dipole moment) of 3.79±1.94x 1022 A m2. This is 56% lower than the average VDM of 5.91±1.74x 1022 A m2 (N=14) calculated from the selected Thellier data from the latest paleointensity database using the same criteria. One possible reason for this difference might be systematic overestimations of paleointensities by the Thellier method on volcanic rocks.
Highlights
The magnetic field generated by the geodynamo is one of the most important features of the Earth
We have conducted rock magnetic and paleomagnetic measurements on Datong volcanic rocks from China formed during the mid to early Brunhes Chron
(3) The 17 independent paleodirection data give a mean VGP position of (76.5◦N, 7.9◦E) with A95=7.7 (N=17). This is statistically distinct from geographic north, indicating that the data do not average out paleosecular variation
Summary
NRM0, initial NRM intensity; T1–T2, N, -r, q, f, slope, temperature interval, number of the data points, correlation coefficient, quality factor, NRM fraction, and slope of the linear NRM-TRM portion in the Arai plot; α, dev, difference angle and deviation of the selected NRM component; FL, laboratory induced DC field for TRM; F, calculated paleointensity. 26.7 method, type of applied methods (perpendicular (perp) or double heating (coe)); P1–P2, N, -r, q, f, slope, power interval, number of the data points, correlation coefficient, quality factor, NRM fraction, and slope of the linear NRM-TRM portion in the Arai plot; α, dev, difference angle and deviation of the selected NRM component; FL, laboratory induced DC field for TRM; F, calculated paleointensity. The same is true for the comparison between the LTD-DHT Shaw and the Thellier methods, as discussed in the above
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.