Abstract

We present in situ rutile and titanite U–Pb geochronology for three samples from the Ur breccia, which forms the boundary between the Malenco unit and the Margna nappe (Eastern Central Alps) near Pass d’Ur in southeast Switzerland. These sampled both oceanic brecciated material and a blackwall reaction zone in contact with a micaschist and serpentinized peridotite. Peak temperatures during Alpine metamorphism in these units were ~ 460 ± 30 °C. Textural observations combined with new geochronological data indicate that rutile and titanite both grew below their closure temperatures during Alpine metamorphism. We present a technique to calculate the most precise and accurate ages possible using a two-dimensional U–Pb isochron on a Wetherill concordia. Rutile from two samples gave a U–Pb isochron age of 63.0 ± 3.0 Ma. This age conflicts with previous 39Ar–40Ar data on heterogeneous amphiboles from which an age of 90–80 Ma was inferred for the high pressure part of the Alpine evolution, but is consistent with K–Ar ages and Ar–Ar ages on phengitic white mica. Titanite from three samples gave a U–Pb isochron age of 54.7 ± 4.1 Ma. This age is consistent with Rb–Sr isochron ages on mylonites along and in the footwall of the Lunghin–Mortirolo movement zone, a major boundary that separates ductile deformation in the footwall from mostly localized and brittle deformation in the hangingwall. Our ages indicate a Paleocene rather than upper Cretaceous metamorphism of the Pennine–Austroalpine boundary and permit at most ~ 15 Myr, and possibly much less, between the growth of rutile and titanite.

Highlights

  • U–Pb geochronology is well established as the ‘gold standard’ of dating techniques, and has most frequently been applied to the extremely robust mineral zircon (e.g. Rubatto 2017)

  • We present in situ rutile and titanite U–Pb geochronology for three samples from the Ur breccia, which forms the boundary between the Malenco unit and the Margna nappe (Eastern Central Alps) near Pass d’Ur in southeast Switzerland

  • As the Malenco region underwent metamorphism that did not exceed 460 ± 30 °C, which is below the closure temperature (TC) of Pb in both rutile and titanite, we date their crystallisation ages during Alpine metamorphism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

U–Pb geochronology is well established as the ‘gold standard’ of dating techniques, and has most frequently been applied to the extremely robust mineral zircon (e.g. Rubatto 2017). In this study we explore the potential of in situ U–Pb dating of low-U rutile and titanite formed at \ 500 °C to obtain growth ages that can be directly related to moderate-temperature metamorphism This approach requires that there is clear textural evidence to link the mineral growth to specific reactions and/or parts of the pressure–temperature evolution. Dating accessory minerals in such an overgrowth relationship demands in situ analysis: while TIMS analysis is more precise, it requires the dissolution of whole grains, which in the case of titanite rimming rutile would provide a meaningless average of U and Pb from the two minerals In this contribution we present LA-ICPMS U–Pb geochronology of rutile and titanite with an overgrowth relationship from samples from the Eastern Central Alps. We show that both minerals record growth ages that date two different points in the P–T evolution during the Alpine orogeny, providing important new constraints on the timing of the metamorphic evolution of the Pennine–Austroalpine boundary

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call