Abstract

Well-preserved fossils of the Late Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway (WIS) of North America have been analyzed for Sr concentration and Sr and O isotopes in order to decipher paleosalinities and paleotemperatures. The samples are from four biofacies within the Seaway (late Maastrichtian): offshore Interior (Pierre Shale), nearshore Interior (Fox Hills Formation), brackish (reduced salinity; Fox Hills Formation) and freshwater (Hell Creek Formation). Samples were also obtained from the Severn Formation of Maryland (considered to be representative of the open ocean). All biofacies (except the freshwater) are demonstrably within the Jeletzkytes nebrascensis ammonite zone (<1 Ma duration). The 87Sr/ 86Sr ratios show significant and systematic decreases from marine (mean±1 S.D.=0.707839±0.000024) to brackish facies (mean±1 S.D.=0.707677±0.000036), consistent with dilution by freshwater with a lower 87Sr/ 86Sr ratio than seawater. Such variation disallows using the 87Sr/ 86Sr ratios of fossil shell material to assign ages to fossils from the Late Cretaceous WIS without knowledge of the salinity in which the organism grew. The Sr isotope ratios for scaphitid ammonites within a single biofacies are similar to each other and different from those for scaphites in other biofacies, implying that these organisms are restricted in their distribution during life. The 87Sr/ 86Sr values of freshwater unionid mussels range widely and are not compatible with the freshwater endmember 87Sr/ 86Sr ratio required by the trend in 87Sr/ 86Sr vs. biofacies established from the other samples. Paleosalinities for the biofacies are estimated to range from 35‰ in the open marine to a minimum of 20‰ in the brackish, based on the presence of cephalopods in all four facies and the known salinity tolerance of modern cephalopods. Producing reasonable 87Sr/ 86Sr values for the freshwater endmember of a 87Sr/ 86Sr vs. 1/[Sr] plot requires a Sr concentration 0.2–0.5 that of seawater for the dominant freshwater input to the WIS. Such high Sr concentrations (relative to seawater) are not observed in modern rivers, and we suggest that the brackish environment in the WIS arose through the mixing of freshwater and seawater in a nearshore aquifer system. Reactions of the solution with aquifer solids in this ‘subterranean estuary’ [Moore, Mar. Chem. 65 (1999) 111–125] produced brackish water with the Sr concentration and isotopic composition recorded in the brackish biofacies. δ 18O values of the fossils show decreases from the marine to brackish biofacies consistent with increasing temperatures (from ∼13 to 23°C) or, if temperatures were relatively constant, to a decrease in the δ 18O of the water in which the shell formed. The latter interpretation is consistent with less-than-fully marine salinities in the nearshore biofacies, but both changes in temperature and the isotopic composition of the water may have occurred in this environment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call