Abstract

Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a benign bone-forming tumour that accounts for about 12% of benign and 3% of all bone neoplasms [1]. It mainly affects patients during childhood or early adulthood, with a male preponderance. Despite its predilection for the long bones of the lower limbs, this tumour can occur in any bone of the skeleton and may be found in the hand and wrist in up to 10% of cases [2]. However, OOs of the distal phalanx are relatively uncommon, with only a few case series reported in the English literature so far [3–5]. The diagnosis of distal phalangeal OO is challenging for several reasons. First, the typical clinical features may not be present [2, 3, 5]. Pain may not be worse at night, or be relieved by aspirin. Moreover, soft-tissue swelling and erythema, as well as nail deformities, may mislead the physician. Second, its imaging characteristics (i.e. a small radiolucent lesion with central calcification, peripheral sclerosis and periosteal reaction [1]) may also be atypical [3–6]. Because of the presence of thickened Sharpey’s fibres, a periosteal reaction is rarely found in the distal phalanx [6]. Besides, endosteal sclerosis may be counterbalanced by local osteopaenia. Furthermore, other bony lesions of the fingertips, such as chronic osteomyelitis, epidermoid cyst, enchondroma or glomus tumour, may mimic an OO [3, 5, 6]. Zampa et al. recently reported the added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for OO in atypical locations, in terms of nidus conspicuity and diagnostic confidence [7]. Third, the histological features may even be unusual [5]. All those reasons could explain the delay, sometimes of several months to years, in the diagnosis and the treatment of phalangeal OOs. The main clinical differential diagnosis of painful fingertip swelling includes whitlow or paronychia, osteomyelitis, glomus tumour, subungual exostosis, arthritis and OO [3, 5, 6]. In our case, conventional radiographs (see Fig. 1 in the Question), ultrasound and previous CT and MR imaging studies (all not shown) barely displayed a focal lesion at the base of the distal phalanx. Follow-up MRI, performed at our institution several months after the onset of symptoms and after failure of initial surgery, demonstrated persisting diffuse inflammatory changes of the distal and middle phalanges as well as in the The case presentation can be found at doi:10.1007/s00256-011-1218-z

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.