Abstract

Guidelines for pain management in adult sickle cell patients with vaso-occlusive crises suggest prompt, frequent administration of parenteral opioids. Neither the ability to implement these guidelines in a busy urban emergency department nor opioid dose requirements in uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis have been previously documented. Thus, a retrospective review of vaso-occlusive crisis treated in an urban medical center emergency department in 2005 was performed to define opioid requirements and barriers to guideline implementation. Fifty-seven visits by 19 patients were evaluable. Opioid treatment was not initiated for more than 2 hours during 30% of visits; the interval between the first and second opioid doses exceeded 1 hour in 26% of visits and increased with subsequent doses; and total treatment time was less than 1 hour during 21% of visits (median, 2.2 hours). Opioid doses (as intravenous morphine equivalents) ranged from 4 to 26.7 mg (0.05-0.50 mg/kg) and exceeded 10 mg during 40 visits (70%) and in 10 patients (53%). Hospitalization occurred on 25 occasions with 48% of patients admitted after 3 or fewer opioid doses and 50% of patients admitted after less than 3 hours of treatment. Moreover, return emergency department visits occurred within 3 days after 9 of 32 home discharges (28%) with treatment times uniformly less than 3 hours during the preceding visit. It is concluded that: (1) opioid dose requirements vary widely, often exceeding guideline recommendations; and (2) treatment time and timely opioid administration are often compromised, resulting in delayed pain control and premature decisions on disposition with early return visits and possibly avoidable hospital admissions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.