P8: A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INTENSIVE OUT-OF-TERM AND CONVENTIONAL TERM-TIME MENTORING SCHEMES IN PREPARING MEDICAL STUDENTS FOR A CAREER IN SURGERY

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Mentoring schemes have been established to mitigate these concerns and improve interest in surgery among medical students; however, there is a paucity of research on whether conventional term-time (CTT) mentoring or more intensive out-of-term (IOT) mentoring is more meaningful in promoting surgical careers. Method Most surgical societies in the UK offer CTT schemes (ca. one-to-three mentoring during the academic year) to their members. In addition to this, a student-led surgical society piloted an IOT scheme (one-to-one mentoring during the summer break). Students completed a ten-point questionnaire at the end of the academic year evaluating the scheme(s) they participated in. Result Of the 35 students that completed a questionnaire, 74% participated in either CTT or IOT (1:1), and 26% participated in both. Students that participated in one scheme considered that scheme to be superior in increasing interest in surgery (CTT 69%; IOT 79%), while students that participated in both favoured IOT (78%). With regards to increasing preparedness for surgical careers, IOT was universally preferred. According to previously determined levels of engagement, maximum engagement was achieved by 61.5% of students in a single week of IOT, compared to only 7.7% of students after a full academic year of CTT. Conclusion IOT outperforms CTT with regards to boosting interest in surgery and preparedness for surgical careers. This suggests that introduction of IOT schemes nationally may be a valuable advance in the future of surgical mentoring. Take-home message Adopting an intensive out-of-term mentoring scheme has shown a positive outcome in terms of both increasing preparedness for, and interest in, surgical careers. This suggests implementing such time intensive schemes nationally could be a sensible future-step in surgical mentoring.