P6465Are we calculated enough? Glomerular filtration rate as a predictor of intra-hospital prognosis in patients with pulmonary embolism

Abstract

Abstract Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) can lead to multi-organ damage including an acute renal dysfunction which is associated with adverse events and high long-term mortality rate. Purpose The aim of our study was to investigate the predictive role of renal dysfunction on intrahospital mortality risk in patients hospitalized due to PE. The study was performed in intensive care units of six university hospitals. Methods The prospective cohort study comprised 665 consecutive patients with acute PE which was confirmed using MDCT. All patients underwent echocardiography examination on admission and blood samples were collected for troponin I (TnI), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and routine laboratory analyses. Results Based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), patients were divided into three groups: first with the GFR <30ml/min, second with GFR 30–60 ml/min, and third with GFR >60 ml/min. During hospitalization in the first group the overall incidence of death was recorded in 28 (45.9%), in the second in 42 (18.9%), and in the third in 30 (7.9%) patients (p<0.0001). Pulmonary embolism as a cause of death was recorded in the first group in 18 (29.5%) patients, in the second in 25 (11.3%) and in the third in 17 (4.5%) patients (p<0.0001). Fatal bleeding was recorded in the first group in 1 (1.6%), in the second in 1 (0.5%) and in the third group in 3 (0.8%) patients (p<0.05). There were no significant differences regarding major bleeding frequency among the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that age, comorbidities, hemodynamic status, TnI, and GFR were strongly associated with an overall mortality rate and with death due to PE, while the use of anticoagulation therapy influenced the fatal bleeding rate. After controlling for age, we found that GFR on admission had a significant effect on in-hospital survival. Compared with patients in the third group, those from the second group had more than 2 fold increased mortality risk [OR 2.17 (CI 1.301–3.625), p=0.001], and patients in the first group had 6 fold higher risk of mortality [OR 6.006 (CI 3.487–6.006)]. In the ROC analysis GFR showed significant predictive value for intra-hospital mortality risk in PE patients [AUC= 0.725, 95% CI (0.68–0.78), p<0.001]. The highest sensitivity (64%) and specificity (70%) had GFR “cutoff” value of 59.12/min. Conclusion Renal dysfunction, on admission, in patients with acute PE is strongly associated with high intrahospital mortality risk and fatal bleeding. The estimation of GFR in these patients is important not only for prediction of the outcome but also for the prevention of bleeding complications, regarding the optimal dosage of anticoagulants. Even though it seems that GFR calculation is not still the clinical routine in PE.