P6019His-Purkinje system pacing in single centre experience after 324 cases

Abstract

Abstract Introduction His-Purkinje system pacing preserves or restores physiologic depolarization of the left ventricle during permanent pacing. It consists of two complementary techniques: His bundle pacing (HB-P) and the recently introduced left bundle branch pacing (LBB-P). There is limited data on HB-P outcomes and only a few reports of LBB-P results. Purpose Our aim was to investigate success rate, complications, acute and early pacing parameters in patients undergoing HB-P and LBB-P in the setting of a cardiology tertiary centre that routinely implants HB-P and LBB-P pacemakers. Methods On the basis of a prospective database we performed a longitudinal cohort study of all consecutive patients with His-Purkinje system devices implanted in the years 2014–2019. In all cases, model 3830 lumen-less 4.1 Fr pacing lead was used. HB-P was achieved via HB mapping or pace mapping, LBB-P was achieved via deep septal lead deployment under electrophysiological and 12-lead ECG guidance. Results Since 2014 there were 324 implantations of His-Purkinje system pacemakers. Baseline patients' characteristics are presented in Table. The overall success rate was 81.5%. Selective HB-P, non-selective HB-P and LBB-P were achieved in 53%, 19% and 28% of successful cases. The mean fluoroscopy time was 11±9 min. The lead delivery was performed using single sheath (C315His) in 83% cases, while in 17% extra steerable sheath was necessary (C304XL). The acute mean LBB-P capture threshold @0.5 ms was significantly lower than in HB-P (0.65±0.43V vs. 1.47±0.8V). The mean chronic LBB-P capture threshold @1.0 ms was also lower than in HB-P (0.45±0.3V vs. 0.95±0.7V, p<0.001). The acute sensing amplitude was significantly higher in LBB-P vs HB-P (10±5mV vs 4±3mV). The mean paced QRS duration was significantly shorter for selective HB-P (113±22 ms) and LBB-P (108±12 ms) vs. non-selective HB-P (132±22 ms). The complications included: 4 cases of threshold increase that required lead revision; 3 early lead dislodgments; 1 loss of LBB capture, 3 pocket hematomas, 2 system infections and 1 pneumothorax. Baseline characteristics Age; sex 73±12 years (19–95 years); 64% males Mean EF; mean QRS duration; Presence of heart failuire or ischemic heart disease 47±15%; 128±32 ms; 48%; 37.5% Pacing indication AV block 31%; sinus node disease 12%; atrial fibrillation with bradycardia 37%; CRT 20% QRS morphology narrow QRS 61%; LBBB 20%; other 14%; IVCD 6% CRT, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; IVCD, Interventricular Conduction Delay. Conclusion His-Purkinje system pacing in routine practice has an acceptable success rate, pacing parameters and complication rate; the LBB-P provides better pacing parameters than HB-P. We believe that such single-centre experience paves the way for a large randomized trial of physiologic pacing.