P5600Surgical reconstruction of type A aortic dissection in octogenarians

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Because the population is aging, the indication for surgical reconstruction in older patients will increase. Japan is especially facing the most aging society worldwide. However, surgical reconstruction of type A aortic dissection (AADA) in patients who are octogenarians is not often performed because of the decision of the patient or surgeon. We examined the outcome of surgical reconstruction of AADA in octogenarians. Method Over 4 years, 132 cases of surgical reconstruction of AADA were analyzed. Twenty-five consecutive octogenarians with AADA were retrospectively reviewed. In our institution, we recommend an emergent operation to the patient or family in all generations unless they reject it for some reason. Results Operative factors in octogenarians with AADA were not significantly different compared with those in patients aged younger than 79 years (n=107) (operation: 238±11 vs. 246±5 min, p=0.54; cardiopulmonary bypass: 147±7.4 vs. 154±3.5 min, p=0.42; aortic-clamp: 114±6.0 vs. 120±2.8 min, p=0.36; hypothermic-arrest: 43±2.7 vs. 42±1.3 min, p=0.81). The overall mortality rate was 24.0% (n=6). The mortality rate was no difference between younger patients and octogenarians (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 0.86–8.21, p=0.08). Furthermore, MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Event) and the postoperative stroke rate were not significantly different between the two groups (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.52–3.93, p=0.42; OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.16–2.59, p=0.69, respectively). Conclusion In AADA, the outcome of emergent surgical reconstruction in octogenarians is acceptable. Even with the risk of aging, surgeons should consider aggressive surgical reconstruction in octogenarians.