P5525Impact of clinical presentation at admission on long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions - a contemporary registry data

Abstract

Abstract Background Both unstable angina (UA) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are still classified together in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes despite the fact they substantially differ in both clinical profile and prognosis. Purpose The aim of the present study was to evaluate contemporary clinical characteristics and outcomes of UA patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with stable angina (SCAD) and myocardial infarction (NSTEMI as well as STEMI) in Swietokrzyskie District of Poland in years 2014–2017. Methods A total of 7'187 patients after PCI from ORPKI Registry (38% with diagnosis of UA) were included into the analysis. Impact of clinical presentation (UA, SCAD, NSTEMI, STEMI) on 3-year outcomes were determined. Results UA patients were older that SCAD but younger than NSTEMI individuals. Diabetes and hypertension were more often encountered into UA group than in NSTEMI but less often than in SCAD cases. In UA group the percentage of previous myocardial infarction (MI), PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was the highest among all analyzed groups. In 3-year observation the risk of death as well as myocardial infarction (MI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in unstable angina after PCI was higher than in stable angina but considerably lower than in NSTEMI group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that prognosis in NSTEMI was substantially worse in comparison with UA (RR 1.365, 95% CI: 1.126–1.655, p=0.0015). On the contrary there were no difference in mortality risk between UA and SCAD patients (RR 1.189, 95% CI: 0.932–1.518, p=0.1620). Parallel results were observed in respect of MI and MACE. Independ predictors of death were: age, kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke or previous PCI. Multivariate logistic regression analyse Clinical presentation Death Myocardial infarction MACE RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value NSTEMI/UA 1.365 1.126–1.655 0.0015 1.822 1.076–3.055 0.0260 1.514 1.267–1.807 <0.0001 NSTEMI/SCAD 1.624 1.251–2.109 0.0003 1.882 0.982–3.789 0.0568 1.604 1.275–2.094 <0.0001 UA/SCAD 1.189 0.932–1.518 0.1620 1.033 0.557–2.034 0.9219 1.060 0.855–1.323 0.6023 MACE, major adverse cardiac events; NSTEMI, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; UA, unstable angina; SCAD, stable angina. Conclusion Unstable angina accounted for 38% of all cases and was the most common diagnosis in patients that underwent PCI in that time. 3-year prognosis in UA was considerable better in comparison with NSTEMI. On contrary there was no difference in outcomes (death, MI, MACE) between UA and SCAD patients.