P499 Anorectal Motility Disorders In Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Abstract

Abstract Background In spite of prolonged disease remission of IBD patients, induced by the new biological molecules, a significant number of them suffer from persistent debilitating symptoms with major impact on the quality of life. Frequently, these symptoms are due to post-inflammatory motility changes and misinterpreted as functional disorders. Our aim is to identify and characterize the anorectal motility dysfunction in IBD patients. Methods We are conducting an ongoing prospective study started in August 2019, which includes the IBD patients admitted in a Tertiary Gastroenterology Centre in Bucharest, with specific symptoms (anorectal pain, incontinence, difficult defecation). We perform high resolution anorectal manometry using Sandhill Scientific systems, the parameters being analysed using InSIGHT software. The manometric testing comprise measurements of anorectal pressure at rest, during squeeze, simulated evacuation, rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) and rectal sensory testing, in compliance with International Anorectal Physiology Working Group protocol Results We studied 30 patients (18 patients with Ulcerative Colitis and 12 patients with Crohn’s Disease, 18 females and 12 males, mean age 40 (±12.85) years. Only 33% (10 patients) had rectal active involvement. Symptoms were reported by 87% (26) patients: anal incontinence (85%), difficult evacuation (35%) and urgency (46%); rectal inflammation was not correlated with the presence of symptoms in our study group (p=0.28). Perianal surgical interventions didn’t represent a risk factor for fecal incontinence (p=0.18), or for dyssinergic defecation (p=0.1). Modified manometric parameters were found in 23 patients (79%). Low resting pressures were registered in 48% of patients; 55% of them presented low squeeze pressures; during push maneuvers, 34% of patients had insufficient rectal propulsive force, presenting low rectal pressures and 59% of them lacked anal canal relaxation. We performed sensibility testing on 18 patients: 9 patients presented criteria for hypersensitivity, hence reduced rectal compliance; 7 patients presented rectal hyposensitivity, while only 2 patients had normal rectal sensation. Recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was present only in 28% of the patients, reflecting the dysfunction of the enteric neural system. Conclusion Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have significantly higher rates of functional anorectal disease. Therefore, pelvic floor investigation is an essential tool in the investigation and management of IBD patients with ongoing symptoms not thought to be related to an IBD flare.