P-475 Effect of transdermal estradiol on endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A randomized control study.

Abstract

Abstract Study question Is patient usage of transdermal estradiol more effective than oral estradiol on endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? Summary answer This study showed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates between the 2 groups. Transdermal gel have advantage of better patient comfort, lesser side effects. What is known already Estrogen and progesterone are crucial factors for endometrial preparation in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Studies assessing different forms of estradiol in FET have already been published. However, literature and studies in Vietnam are still limited to evaluating, research evaluating transdermal estrogen in ART. This study aimed to evaluate the use of transdermal estradiol gel and compare it with oral estradiol for the endometrium preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Study design, size, duration This randomized clinical trial (RCT) included 380 frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles from February 2020 to August 2021 at the IVF Department, Hung Vuong Hospital. Participants/materials, setting, methods They were randomized into one of the two groups. Group A (n = 190) received oral estradiol and group B (n = 190) received estradiol gel. In both groups, medication was started on day 2 of the menstrual, and endometrial thickness was monitored by ultrasound. Main outcomes were the following: serum estradiol level , endometrial thickness,.... Secondary outcomes were CPR, MR, and side effects in the 2 groups. Statistical testing was performed with Stata 14. Main results and the role of chance There was a significant difference in estradiol level on the day of progesterone administration and embryo transfer between the two groups (270.5 pg/ml versus 186.5 pg/ml, p, p. <0.001). According to the comparison, the two groups were not significantly different in the endometrial thickness on the day of progesterone administration (p = 0.85). as the data suggest, the total dose of estradiol used and the total number of days of dosing were similar in the two groups. The biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates were similar between the two groups and did not a significantly differ (56.2% vs. 52.2%, p = 0.474). The rate of miscarriage was higher than in the study group, but it was not statistically significant. Almost 20.3% of patients (n = 37) in group A had mild adverse effects when compared with only 10.1% (n = 18) in group B, and this was clinically significant (P = 0.007). Limitations, reasons for caution The limitation of our study was not asses ongoing pregnancy rate and live-birth rate. Wider implications of the findings Patients who estradiol valerate is contraindicated such as, high risk for deep vein thrombosis, hyperlipidemia, and clotting disturbance we can use oestrogel to be safe. It is suggested that estradiol transdermal patches be used instead of oral estradiol in FET cycles Trial registration number ISRCTN15301227