Abstract

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF), which is constantly increasing in the population, is associated with an important care burden linked, in particular, to its consequences (stroke, heart failure, etc.). In patients with an implantable cardiac device (CIED) it is frequent the detection of high atrial frequency episodes (AHRE), often asymptomatic, for which an increased thromboembolic risk has been described (about 2.5 times) but lower than the clinical AF for which there is still no unanimous consensus regarding the initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). We report below our experience in patients undergoing CIED implantation in whom AHRE was detected and OAT started, evaluating the characteristics of thromboembolic risk and the follow–up of complications. Methods From 01 January 2020 to 31 December 2021, 242 patients (mean age 74.8 years) underwent CIED implant. Among these, 41 patients (16.9% mean age 78.6 years – 30 males and 11 females) presented episodes of AHRE, detected by remote monitoring, lasting between a few seconds and more than 24 hours. The mean CHADsVasc score of these patients was 3.8. Seven patients were not anticoagulated due to arrhythmic episodes lasting a few minutes and CHADsVasc score equal to 1–2, while the other 34 started OAT with DOAC. Results No thromboembolic events or major bleeding events have been recorded to date; only minor bleedings (11 epistaxis, 4 haematuria and 5 SOF positivity) were easily treated. Conclusions The current guidelines indicate to prolong monitoring until the detection of clinical AF or an arrhythmic burden > 24 hours before considering OAT; however, there are studies that recommend carefully correlating the duration of arrhythmic events with the determination of the thromboembolic risk. In our experience, the high thromboembolic risk of patients, sometimes not adequately represented by the CHADsVasc score, led us to start OAT even when the duration of the episodes was not particularly long and at the moment no major complications have been observed. The two ongoing trials (ARTESia and NOAH) dedicated to the evaluation of these situations will provide valuable indications on the treatment of these patients in whom the thromboembolic risk is certainly lower than that of patients with clinical AF but still not negligible.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call