P454 Systemic free thiols associate with clinical and biochemical disease activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a prospective diagnostic validation study

Abstract

Abstract Background In the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), oxidative stress plays an important role. Lower levels of plasma free thiols (FT) reflect a higher oxidative stress burden and correlate with IBD disease activity. However, their clinical significance as biomarker for disease activity remains unclear. This study aimed to prospectively validate the utility of plasma FT levels as biomarker for clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic disease activity in patients with IBD. Methods In an ongoing prospective diagnostic trial aiming to include 100 IBD patients, we conducted an interim analysis of plasma FT levels in 52 patients with IBD (24 Crohn's disease [CD], 21 ulcerative colitis [UC], and 7 patients with undetermined IBD). Clinical disease activity was quantified by the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CD and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) for UC. Biochemical disease activity was determined by measuring blood C-reactive protein [CRP] and faecal calprotectin [fCal]). Endoscopic disease activity was quantified with the Mayo endoscopic subscore for UC and the Simple Endoscopic Score (SES-CD) for CD. Plasma FT levels were assessed for correlations with disease activity parameters using linear and logistic regressions models. Discriminative capacity of biomarkers was evaluated through calculating receiver operating characteristics (ROC) statistics. Results Plasma FT levels were significantly negatively correlated in clinical parameters, like HBI (r = -0.53, p < 0.05) (Fig. 1A). Other inflammatory biomarkers, like CRP, were also negatively correlated with plasma FT levels and were reduced in patients with active IBD (r = -0.43, p < 0.05) (Fig. 1B). Plasma FT levels accurately discriminated between CD patients with clinically quiescent (HBI < 5) and active disease (HBI ≥ 5) (AUC = 0.80, p = 0.02, Fig. 1C), better than fCal (AUC = 0.55, p = 0.83). Plasma FT were not significantly different for biochemically quiescent (CRP < 5 mg/l) and active (CRP ≥ 5mg/l) disease (AUC = 0.69, p = 0.20, Fig. 1D). Both Mayo and SES-CD scores, after adjusting for confounders, also exhibited a trend towards negative association with plasma FT levels (Fig. 1E). Figure 1 Conclusion Further completion of the trial will reveal whether systemic FT levels will reflect endoscopically observed disease activity, and this interim analysis shows strong correlations FT levels and parameters of clinically and biochemically active disease. Measuring systemic FTs in IBD may be a promising, minimally invasive strategy to monitor IBD disease activity. Funding None