Abstract

Abstract Background Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVI) are treatment options in patients with severe aortic stenosis. International guidelines suggest both traditional risk scores and a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (GCA) be determinants in treatment decision–making. The aim of the study is to identify the GCA parameters associated with the decision to perform TAVI instead of SAVR in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. Materials and Methods Between 2019 and 2022, 66 patients aged ≥75 years were referred to the Cardiology department of Padua Hospital for pre–operative evaluation, including CGA. The CGA consisted of functional status (Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scales), cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment), mood disorders (Geriatric Depression Scale), physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery, 6–minute Walking Test, grip strength) and quality of life (Short–Form 36 items Health Survey). Results SAVR was proposed to 53% of patients and TAVI to 47%. The mean age was 78.9 ± 4.8 years and 47% were women. TAVI patients were older and had lower scores on both cognitive and motor performance tests than SAVR patients. The geriatric parameters associated with treatment decision–making between SAVR and TAVI were age (OR= 1.64, p < 0.04) and gait speed (OR= 0.09, p = 0.05). Conclusions Therapeutic decision–making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis is not only influenced by age, but also by a frailty index, gait speed. This could become a simple, quick and inexpensive routine test to effectively stratify patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call