P4-11-06: Uptake of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators and Other Breast Cancer Prevention Strategies among High-Risk Women Seen in a Breast Center.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), tamoxifen and raloxifene, are FDA-approved for breast cancer (BC) risk reduction. However, uptake has been poor in the prevention setting, partly due to a lack of knowledge in the medical community about BC prevention and public misconceptions about the risks of SERMs. We assessed demographic and clinical factors that influence SERM uptake among high-risk women seen in an academic breast center, where specialized risk counseling is provided by a breast surgeon or medical oncologist. Methods: Potential subjects included high-risk women seen for an initial consultation by Breast Surgery or Medical Oncology. Eligibility for SERM use included a 5-year Gail risk ≥1.67%, lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), BRCA mutation carrier, or estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Demographic and BC risk factor data was collected from self-administered questionnaires. Clinical data, including prior/current SERM use, was abstracted from medical chart review. Differences in distribution of risk factors, between women who ever took a SERM and those who did not, were examined using chi-square statistics or Fisher's exact test. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals using SERM use as the dependent variable. Results: Among 247 high-risk women enrolled between March 2007 and January 2011, median age 51 (17-82); White/Hispanic/Black/Asian (%): 55/32/7/6. 85% of women were undergoing annual mammography, 94% had a breast biopsy, 19% genetic testing, and 71% Medical Oncology referral. Among 181 (73%) women eligible for a SERM, Gail risk ≥1.67%/LCIS/DCIS/BRCA mutation (%): 35/22/39/3; 83 (46%) ever took a SERM, including 62 on tamoxifen and 21 on raloxifene. Early SERM discontinuation was only 7%. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors of SERM uptake included risk category (DCIS vs. Gail risk ≥1.67%/LCIS/BRCA mutation), higher income, higher body mass index (BMI), and referral to Medical Oncology. In terms of this high-risk population meeting American Cancer Society (ACS) behavioral guidelines for cancer prevention, 53% had a BMI <25 kg/m2, 44% consumed ≤1 alcoholic beverage per day, and 10% engaged in ≥4 hours of moderate physical activity per week; only 3.5% met all 3 recommendations. Conclusions: Among high-risk women seen at a specialized breast center, application of clinical recommendations such as screening mammography, genetic testing, and SERM uptake were relatively high, suggesting that a comprehensive approach to the management of high-risk women is feasible. However, meeting ACS nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer prevention was limited, perhaps due to a lack of reimbursable staff to implement these guidelines. Breast cancer risk assessment and available interventions for prevention among high-risk women are underutilized in the U.S. Future studies should focus on the development and delivery of breast cancer prevention strategies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-06.