P-381 Fertility preservation in patients with testicular cancer

Abstract

Abstract Study question Do the clinical stage and histological characteristics of testicular cancer affect sperm quality? Summary answer Sperm concentration, motility and normal morphology significantly decreased in patients with testicular cancer. However, semen parameters were not significantly associated with tumor histology. What is known already Testicular cancer is rare in most countries, with an incidence ranging from ∼1/100,000 to 10/100,000, and represents about 1% of all cancers in men, but about 60% of all cancers in young males aged between 15 and 35 years. Additionally, the incidence of testicular cancer has doubled in the last 20-40 years. While it is clear that chemotherapy treatment can negatively impact infertility, it is increasingly recognized that male-factor infertility may play a significant role in the overall health status of men, and men with infertility may be at higher risk of developing testicular cancer. Study design, size, duration Retrospective data from 284 males, diagnosed with testicular cancer, undergoing to semen cryopreservation before surgery or chemo- or radiotherapy treatments, from January 2016 to June 2022 at Maternal and Child Department, Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Couple Sterility Center at Federico II, University of Naples, were included in the study. Participants/materials, setting, methods All patients signed their informed consent to cryopreservation. In order to have an internal control group coming from the same region, results of semen analysis from male partners of couples with certain female factors (bilateral tubal imperviousness or in case of egg donation) were included in the study. After semen collection and liquefaction, the semen specimens were cryopreserved following manufacturer’s protocol with media conteining TEST-yolk buffer. Main results and the role of chance Overall, taking in to consideration the semen cryopreservation, per WHO 2021 criteria, we observed that the majority of semen parameters of patients with testicular cancer resulted between 5°percentile and 25° percentile. The unique parameter over the 50°percentile was the semen volume. Comparing results from male partners of couples with certain female factors and testicular cancer patients several features were significant different. Especially, semen volume resulted significantly increased in cases respect to the control (p = 0,011). Instead, from microscopic evaluation semen concentration, percentage of total sperm motility and % of spermatozoa with normal morphology appeared significantly decreased in patients with testicular cancer (p = 0,000; p = 0,000; p = 0,002). Based on Histopathological Classification of Testicular Tumors the 59% (168/284) were classified as classic seminoma, 14% (41/284) mixed germ cell tumors including seminomatous and nonseminomatous cell tumors, 13% (38/284) nonseminomatous mixed germ cell tumors, 12% (35/284) nonseminomatous germ cell tumors including 4 cases of teratoma and 30 cases of embryonal carcinoma and 2 cases of cariocarcinoma. However, abnormal semen parameters were not significantly associated with tumor histology. Limitations, reasons for caution No information about semen quality after thawing and ICSI outcome could represent the main limitation for a complete information of the preservation program in these patients. Wider implications of the findings We presented our monocentric experience of oncofertility preservation program with especially attention to testicular cancer patients. Presented data emphasizes the importance of semen monitoring in young men and the fertility preservation in management of the patient. Trial registration number not applicable