P3724Impact of chronic kidney disease on efficacy and safety of interventional left atrial appendage closure – results from the prospective multicenter LAARGE registry

Abstract

Abstract Background The interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective and safe alternative to standard oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with contraindications for long-term OAC. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a high prevalence among AF patients, and was shown to increase the number of peri-procedural complications in cardiac interventions. Purpose This subanalysis of the LAARGE registry aimed to investigate CKD's impact on outcomes after LAAC. Methods This prospective, real-world LAAC registry included 625 patients with documented renal function from 37 German centers between April 2014 and January 2016. CKD was defined by an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Procedure was conducted with different LAAC devices considering the relevant recommendations. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, intra-hospital and one-year follow-up outcome were registered for CKD and non-CKD patients stratified by the different CKD stages. Results CKD patients (n=300; 48.0%) had a more pronounced cardiovascular risk profile, a higher stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.9±1.5 vs. 4.2±1.5; p<0.001) and bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score 4.3±1.0 vs. 3.5±1.0; p<0.001), and had experienced more prior bleedings (83.7 vs. 76.3%; p=0.022). Implantation success was similarly high between both groups (97.9%; p=n.s.). In CKD patients, MACCE during one-year follow-up was more frequent (18.1 vs. 6.8%; p<0.001) mainly being triggered by all-cause deaths, but in-hospital MACCE was not (0.3 vs. 0.3%; p=n.s.). Kaplan-Meier estimation showed a lower one-year survival among CKD patients (82.4 vs. 94.4%; p<0.001) without significant accentuation in patients with advanced CKD (i.e., <30 mL/min/1.73 m2; p=n.s. to other CKD patients). While annual rate of device associated complications (2.6 vs. 2.8%; p=n.s.) and strokes (0 vs. 1.0%; p=n.s.) was comparable during follow-up, annual severe bleeding rate was higher in CKD patients (2.6 vs. 0.3%; p=0.027) which was 71.4 and 94.4% less than expected from the HAS-BLED score (p<0.01 for the comparison to the estimated risks, but no significant interaction between groups). Conclusions Despite an increased cardiovascular risk profile of CKD patients, device implantation was safe, and annual stroke rate was statistically indifferent to non-CKD patients across all CKD stages after LAAC. Moreover, a substantial reduction of annual stroke and major bleeding risk was observed, as compared to the estimated annual risk. Acknowledgement/Funding Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany