P368 Correlation between patient-reported outcome measures in inflammatory bowel disease and other measures of disease activity: a systematic review

Abstract

Abstract Background The clinical activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has traditionally been evaluated by healthcare professionals. To allow direct reporting of symptoms by patients, several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed. We evaluated the correlation between IBD-specific PROMs and measures of endoscopic activity. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed up to June 2022. Searches were conducted in three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science). The search protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022383899). Studies reporting the correlation between self-administered, IBD-specific PROMs and endoscopic scores were included. A descriptive analysis was performed by assessing the correlation between PROMs and IBD endoscopic activity. PROMs used in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were considered separately. Results Seventeen PROMs were identified encompassing a series of IBD signs and symptoms, mainly abdominal pain (n=10), stool frequency (n=6) and rectal bleeding (n=4). Twenty-two studies assessed correlations of PROMs with existing clinical measures of disease activity and/or their accuracy in predicting remission. The mainly used endoscopic indices were Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) and Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) (n=11), and clinical indices were Harvey–Bradshaw Index for CD (n=7) and SCCAI for UC (n=7). Most studies used more than one comparator as standard for validation. A marked heterogeneity in the study design and statistical methods was observed. In CD, five studies analysed correlations between PROMs and SES-CD. They generally found weak correlations with PROMs (PRO2, n=2; mobile Health Index [mHI]-CD, n=1) (Figure), except for one which found a negative moderate correlation between PRO2 and SES-CD. The strongest correlation was with the stool frequency item of the Monitor IBD at home (MIAH) questionnaire. In UC, four studies assessed the correlation between PROMs and MES. Positive weak-to-moderate correlations were found with PRO2, MIAH rectal bleeding item and mHI-UC MES in four studies. Conclusion In CD, PROMs poorly correlate with endoscopic activity. However, in UC, rectal bleeding reasonably correlates with endoscopic status. It is well known that IBD symptoms overlap with those of other digestive diseases as functional disorders, especially in CD. In line with this, our data suggest that PROMs cannot substitute endoscopic data to monitor disease activity in IBD, especially in CD patients. Nonetheless, they represent a valuable complementary instrument to comprehensively describe disease control by capturing patient perspective. More studies are needed to better evaluate correlations between PROMs and clinical disease activity measures.