P-359 Ten years’ experience using cryopreserved oocytes from In Vitro Maturation (IVM) or Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH) cycles for fertility preservation in oncologic indications

Abstract

Abstract Study question Is IVM a relevant option for fertility preservation in cancer patients, considering biological/clinical outcomes post-thawing, compared to COH? Summary answer This study shows that despite a significantly altered embryo morphology within the IVM group, the clinical outcomes remain comparable to those of COH. What is known already Fertility Preservation (FP) techniques are proposed to patients with cancer to provide the possibility of childbearing using their own gametes. Currently, oocyte vitrification after COH is the standard option. IVM serves as an alternative when COH is contraindicated, urgent cancer therapy is required, or in conjunction with ovarian cortex cryopreservation. Limited live births have been reported from frozen-thawed oocytes in IVM cycles of cancer survivors. Scarce data are available for comparing biological/clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed oocytes from IVM versus COH cycles in cancer survivors. Study design, size, duration This bicentric retrospective cohort study aimed to analyze the outcomes of all oocyte warming cycles in 73 cancer survivors having undergone oocyte vitrification for FP after COH and/or IVM. All of them had oocyte retrieval before the administration of gonadotoxic treatment and returned after being cured, with their oncologist agreement, for assisted reproduction treatments, between November 2012 and January 2024. Participants/materials, setting, methods Seventy-seven warming attempts followed by ICSI respectively from 37 COH and 40 IVM cycles were analyzed. Four patients benefited from an IVM and COH cycle. Survival, fertilization, top and good-quality embryos, defined at day-2 respectively as 4 and 3-5 adequate-sized blastomeres, without multinucleation with < 20% of cytoplasmic fragments, implantation, biochemical (hCG>100 UI/mL), clinical (intrauterine sac with fetal heartbeat) and live birth rates were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Main results and the role of chance The mean age and antral follicle count at the time of FP was similar in both groups. The indications for FP were breast cancer (n = 61), hematologic malignancies (n = 7), ovarian cancer (n = 3), other (n = 2). The number of cryopreserved oocytes tended to be higher in the COH group, when compared to the IVM group (8.5±7.3 vs 5.9±4.04; p = 0.16). The mean oocyte maturation rate after IVM was 68.6±23.1%. Oocyte survival, and fertilization rates were similar in COH and IVM groups, respectively (76.4±27.0% vs 76.1±22.0%; p = 0.76) and (67.1±34.3% vs 65.3±25.4%; p = 0.36). We reported a significantly better embryo quality at day-2 in the COH group when compared to the IVM group, with respectively top-quality embryos (44.0±34.2% vs 26.1±33.4%, p = 0,04) and good-quality embryos (62.2±38.0% vs 42.8±40.8%, p = 0.049), and also a significantly higher number of useful embryo in the COH group (2.7±2.6 vs 1.5±1.2, p = 0.03). Regarding clinical outcomes, the results were similar in COH and IVM groups, in terms of implantation rates (12.2±30.4% vs 15.5±35.6%; p = 0.86), biochemical (32.3% (10/31) vs 17.9% (6/28); p = 0.39), clinical pregnancies (25.8% (8/31) vs 17.9% (4/28); p = 0.54), live birth rates ( 25.8% (8/31) vs 14.3% (4/28); p = 0.34). Limitations, reasons for caution Statistical power to compare IVF outcomes after COH and IVM is limited by the few women who returned to use their frozen oocytes. The subjective nature of embryo morphology assessment. Wider implications of the findings This study is the largest evaluating frozen-warmed oocytes from IVM cycles in cancer patients, with 5 live births newly reported. A higher oocyte-yield may be necessary in IVM as the number of useful embryos is significantly lower. Novel approaches are being developed to improve maturation rates following IVM. Trial registration number Not applicable