P3-07-16: The Efficacy of Arm Node Preserving Surgery Using Axillary Reverse Mapping for Preventing Lymphedema in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Abstract

Abstract Background Lymphedema affects over 20% of breast cancer patients undergoing axillary dissection. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) technique to identify and preserve arm node during sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was developed to prevent lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to investigate the location and the metastatic rate of the arm node, and finally to evaluate the short term incidence of lymphedema after arm node preserving surgery. Patients and Methods From January 2009 to October 2010, 97 breast cancer patients who underwent ARM were enrolled. 2.5ml blue dye was injected in ipsilateral upper inner arm. After at least 20 minutes after injection, SLNB or ALND was performed in the usual manner and blue stained arm nodes and/or lymphatics were identified. We checked arm circumference at baseline and average of 8.8 months after operation in ALND cases and 13.7 months in SLNB cases. Patients were divided into two groups, arm node preserved group (70 patients in ALND, 10 patients in SLNB) and unpreserved group (13 patients in ALND, 4 patients in SLNB). The difference of arm circumference between preoperative and postoperative was checked in these groups. Results: The mean number of identified blue stained arm nodes was 1.4±0.6. The arm nodes were found in the inferolateral side of axillary and thoracodorsal vessels in 57 patients (58.76%), the inferomedial side in 37 patients (38.14%), the superolateral side in 2 patients (2.06%), and the superomedial side in 1 patient (1.04%). In the majority of patients (92%), arm nodes were located between the lower level of the axillary vein and just below the second intercostal brachial nerve. In arm node unpreserved group, 2 patients had metastasis in their arm node. The one had a common pathway between the arm node and the sentinel lymph node. Another did not have a common pathway, but had extranodal extension with N3 metastasis. Among ALND patients, in arm node preserved group, the difference of arm circumference between preoperative and postoperative in ipsilateral and contralateral arm was 0.27cm and 0.07cm, respectively, whereas 0.47cm and −0.03cm in unpreserved group, and one lymphedema was found after 6 months. No difference was found between arm node preserved and unpreserved group amoung SLNB patients (0.21cm and 0.39cm in in preserved group, 0.2cm and 0.02cm in unpreserved group). Conclusion: Arm node preserving was possible in all breast cancer patients with identifiable arm node, during ALND or SLNB, except for those with high surgical N stage, and lymphedema did not developed in patient with arm node preserving surgery. Metastasis was not found in arm node preserving group in current results, but need to be observed in the ongoing progress. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-16.