(P2-93) Triage During a Mass Casualty Incident: The 2009 Turkish Airlines Crash in Amsterdam

Abstract

IntroductionTriage is an important aspect of the management of mass-casualty incidents (MCIs). This study evaluates triage after the Turkish Airlines aircraft crash near Amsterdam in 2009. What were the results of triage? What were the injuries of priority 3, and of “walking” casualties? Did the mechanism of trauma have a factor in this mass-casualty triage? How does this affect spinal immobilization rate during transport?MethodsA retrospective analysis of investigational reports, ambulance forms, and medical charts of survivors of the crash was performed. Outcomes included triage classification, type of injury, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, Injury Severity Scale (ISS) score, need for emergency intervention according to the “Baxt criteria”, and spinal immobilization during transport.ResultsThere was minimal documentation of prehospital triage. According to the in-hospital triage, 28% of patients were priority 1, 10% had an ISS score ≥ 16, and 3% met the Baxt criteria for emergency intervention. Forty percent were priority 3, 72% had an ISS score ≤ 8, and 63% were discharged from the emergency department. Approximately 83% were over-triaged, and the critical mortality rate was 0%. Nine percent of priority 3 casualties. and 17% of “walking” casualties had serious injuries. Twenty-five percent of all casualties were transported with spinal immobilization; 22% of patients with diagnosed spinal injury were not transported with spinal immobilization.ConclusionsAfter the Turkish Airlines crash, documentation of triage was minimal. According to the Baxt criteria, there was a great amount of over-triage. Possible injuries sustained by plane crash survivors that seem minimally harmed (P3) must not be underestimated. Considering spinal immobilization, Not insufficient consideration given the high-energy trauma mechanism.