P2705Hybrid QFR-FFR decision making strategy for revascularization

Abstract

Abstract Background Measurement of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become a standard practice for revascularization decision-making in evaluating the functional significance of angiographically intermediate epicardial coronary stenosis. The quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method for rapid computational estimation of FFR without pressure wire and vasodilator drugs. Purpose Nevertheless, the evidence was shown the clinical better outcome of coronary revascularization stratified by FFR, the adoption of FFR remains low. We hypothesized that combined QFR and FFR hybrid strategy could improve the physiological assessment without pressure wire and drugs. Methods and results We performed a post-hocanalysis of 549 vessels with angiographically intermediate stenosis in 549 patients who underwent measurement of FFR. The median FFR and QFR values were 0.81 (0.73–0.87) and 0.79 (0.74–0.87), respectively.The ischemic threshold was defined as 0.80 for both QFR and FFR measures. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the QFR for predicting an FFR of ≤0.80 were 86.2%, 71.9%, 78.9%, 74.5%, and 84.5%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using the cut-off threshold of ≤0.80 for the FFR was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–0.88) for the QFR.In total, 433 (78.9%) and 116 (21.1%) lesions showed concordant and discordant FFR and QFR functional classifications, respectively. A hybrid QFR-FFR strategy was developed, by allowing deferral when QFR values providing negative predictive value greater than 90% and treat others when QFR values greater than that showing 90% positive predictive value, with adenosine being given only to patients with QFR in between those values. For the FFR cut-off (0.8), an QFR of <0.73 could be used to confirm treatment (PPV of 90.7%), while an QFR value of >0.83 could be used to defer revascularization (NPV of 90.0%). When QFR values fall between 0.73 and 0.84, adenosine is given for hyperemic induction and the FFR cut-off of 0.8 is used to guide revascularization. This hybrid QFR-FFR approach has a 95% agreement with an FFR-only decision making, and 285 lesions (51.9%) would have obviated the need of a pressure wire and adenosine. Hybrid QFR-FFR strategy Conclusions A hybrid QFR-FFR strategy for coronary revascularization could reduce the need of a pressure wire and vasodilator drugs, which may increase the penetration of functional assessment of coronary lesions.