P2696Clinical characteristics of late catch-up phenomenon after implantation of 2nd generation drug eluting stent

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Late catch-up phenomenon (LCU) of 1st generation drug eluting stent (DES) has been increasing yearly despite the rate of restenosis in 1 year has reduced compared with bare metal stent (BMS). 2nd generation DES was more improved than 1st generation DES and suggested more benefits about clinical outcome. Purpose To investigate the incidence and predictor of LCU after implantation of 2nd generation DES and to evaluate the association between LCU phenomenon and adverse events. Methods Between August 2012 and July 2013, a total of 1665 consecutive patients (1956 lesions with elective/urgent PCI) were enrolled in SHINANO 5 years Registry (a prospective observational multicenter cohort study) from 13 institutions in Nagano, Japan. 711 patients that were treated with 2nd generation DES and 576 patients with BMS were selected. Exclusion criterias were cases of 1st DES, only POBA, only aspiration and chronic total occulusion. Results There were significant difference about patients background between BMS and 2nd generation DES groups. Those groups were matched with propensity score. After matching, 822 patients (BMS group 411 patients, 2nd generation group 411 patients) were analyzed. The rates of 2nd DES and BMS restenosis 5 years after initial PCI were 9.2% and 8.5% (p=0.572), those of LCU were 2.6% and 5.6% (p=0.043) by 1 year landmark analysis. Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that the DES in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesion and higher HbA1c were independent predictors for LCU from 1year to 5year (HR 5.304, p=0.009, HR 1.254, p=0.015), but 2nd generation DES was not. Kaplan Meier curve showed no association between LCU phenomenon and all cause death (p=0.446). Cox regression analysis showed LCU was not independent predictor for all cause death (p=0.414). Conclusions Implantation to DES-ISR lesion with 2nd generation DES was associated with higher LCU. Despite of more complex lesions with 2nd generation DES, there were no differences of LCU incidence between 2nd generation DES and BMS. Acknowledgement/Funding None