Abstract

Introduction: Regorafenib (REG) prolongs overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in RCTs. However, there is a problem with REG-induced severe liver dysfunction (≥Grade 3) which occurs in 5-11% of treated Japanese pts. Therefore, we analyzed the incidence, therapeutic efficacy, and potential risk factors for REG-induced severe liver dysfunction in a community-based retrospective study (HGCSG1401) of pts treated with REG. Methods: 173 pts treated with REG were retrospectively registered from 22 centers in Japan. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and Cox-proportional hazard model were used to compare Grade 0-2 and 3-5. To identify risk factors for REG-induced severe liver dysfunction, a multivariate analysis was performed using the logistic regression analysis with backward elimination for variables with p < 0.10 in univariate analysis. Results: In 173 eligible pts, 24 (13.9%) experienced REG-induced severe liver dysfunction. The median PFS of Grade 0-2 and 3-5 were 2.2 and 1.6 months, respectively. The median OS of Grade 0-2 and 3-5 were 6.9 and 3.4 months, respectively. In the analysis of PFS and OS, there were significant difference between Grade 0-2 and 3-5 (PFS: HR 1.578, p = 0.045, OS: HR 1.799, p = 0.010). Univariate analyses showed that high AST, LDH, ALP, and GGT level at baseline were associated with REG-induced severe liver dysfunction. In multivariate analyses, high baseline AST level (≥ 50 U/L) was significantly associated with increased risk of REG-induced severe liver dysfunction (odds ratio=3.458, p = 0.032). Conclusion: Compared with previous reports, this analysis showed the slightly higher incidence of REG-induced severe liver dysfunction (13.9%). In multivariate analysis, it was inferred that high AST level (≥ 50 U/L) at baseline might be an independent risk factor. REG-induced severe liver dysfunction population significantly showed shorter OS than mild liver dysfunction. It is presumed that this patient population could not receive TAS-102 as post regorafenib therapy. Since this is an exploratory analysis, we consider it necessary to verify in large data set.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call