P2446Defining values of volumes and longitudinal strain for the different types of left ventricular remodeling patterns in subjects with normal ejection fraction - a single center study

Abstract

Abstract Background The left ventricle (LV) undergoes different types of remodeling to normalize its wall stress. There has been an increase in the trend in research regarding the process of remodeling but little is known about how LV volumes and global longitudinal strain (GLS) may vary depending upon the type of remodeling. Purpose To define the values of LV volumes and GLS in patients with different types of LV remodeling with normal ejection fraction (EF). Methods Single center retrospective study conducted from 2008 to 2018. We selected 10,356 subjects >18 years (5808 females, 4548 males) with normal EF and who underwent 2D echocardiography (2DE) at Mayo clinic, Rochester. They were categorized into 4 groups (Figure) i.e., group 1 = normal geometry, group 2 = concentric remodeling, group 3 = concentric hypertrophy, group 4 = eccentric hypertrophy based on their LV mass index (102 g/m2 in males, 88 g/m2 in females) and relative wall thickness (0.42) values measured by 2DE (figure). The patterns of LV GLS, end diastolic and end systolic volumes (EDV, ESV) indexed to body surface area were analyzed in these four groups by gender and body mass index (BMI). Mean±SD, One-way Anova, two sample t-test and Tukey- Kramer HSD were applied. Results The mean age of the selected population is 57.9 years ±14.9 (females=57.7±14.7, males=58.2±15.1) and the body surface area of 1.9 m2±0.2 (females=1.8±2 and males=2.1±0.2). The LV GLS values (Figure) of groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were −20.7, −18.9, −17.5 and −19.9 and their EDV cc/m2 values were 63.6, 58.5, 61.2 and 68.2 respectively. LV GLS and Biplane EF values were higher in females while Biplane EDV and ESV were higher in males. When each gender is sub-divided based on their BMI (<25 and ≥25), the LV GLS, EDV and ESV values were higher in all groups with BMI<25 except in males with concentric remodeling and females with concentric hypertrophy where they were low. Remodeling distribution Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the biggest single center study to evaluate LV GLS and volumes based on type of remodeling by gender and BMI. When compared with normal geometry, LV volumes and GLS values were statistically different among each type of remodeling as well as for gender and BMI. These results can be used as reference values in patient population studies where remodeling is being analyzed in subjects with normal LV EF. Acknowledgement/Funding None