P240 PREOPERATIVE OPTIMISATION FOR A PATIENT WITH HEART FAILURE UNDERGOING MAJOR NON–CARDIAC SURGERY: AN EXAMPLE OF COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE MULTIMODAL PREHABILITATION CENTRE AND THE HEART FAILURE CLINIC AT CAREGGI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Heart failure (HF) is a risk factor for postoperative mortality in major non–cardiac surgery. Collaboration between the Multimodal Preoperative Prehabilitation unit (MPP) and Heart Failure Clinic (HFC) could allow optimization of heart failure therapy and negative prognostic factors such as reduced functional capacity (FC), malnutrition, and sarcopenia to improve the prognosis of these patients. Case report: Mrs. C.M. is a 58–year–old patient who presents to the MPP unit in anticipation of total colectomy for drug–refractory ulcerative colitis. Mrs. C.M. has a past medical history significant for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF 25%) of presumably valvular–arrhythmic etiology. She underwent tricuspid annuloplasty and mitral replacement surgery some years ago and is affected by atrial fibrillation. At the MPP unit, Mrs. C.M. had a reduced FC and was malnourished and sarcopenic. Blood tests showed iron deficiency anemia. Heart failure therapy (NYHA II) was not optimized according to guidelines. Therefore, the patient started multimodal prehabilitation consisting of aerobic and resistance exercise, nutritional intervention, intravenous iron infusion, and optimization of HF therapy. After the patient was evaluated at the HFC, she started empagliflozin, sacubitril/valsartan, and ranolazine; intermittent levosimendan therapy was also performed. She also underwent cardiac NMR, which showed non–ischemic fibrosis, and coronary angiography, which was negative. Finally, she underwent PM–ICD implantation. After six months of multimodal prehabilitation, there was an increase in EF (38% vs. 25%), a reduction in NT–proBNP (700 vs 4988 pg/mL), and mitigation of HF symptoms. There was also a marked improvement in FC (383 vs 269 meters at 6–minute walking test), nutritional status (stage B vs stage C at PG–SGA test), and muscle strength (handgrip strength test 14.6 vs 8.5 kg). Considering the excellent preoperative optimization response, it was decided to proceed with surgery after a collegial discussion (anesthetist, heart failure cardiologist, surgeon, and patient). Conclusions Multimodal preoperative prehabilitation, based on the collaboration between the Multimodal Preoperative Prehabilitation Unit and Heart Failure Clinic, can effectively improve the preoperative functional capacity of HF patients.