Abstract

Abstract Background Data of large cohort studies on the fate of perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease (CD) is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and natural history of perianal fistulas in adults with Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods Data from the Swiss IBD cohort study were analysed. The Swiss IBD Cohort study includes since 2006 IBD patients, follow-up questionnaires are completed once a year. Patients were recruited from university centres (80%), regional hospitals (19%), and private practices (1%). Results Among 2163 CD patients, 495 (22.9%) ever had perianal fistulas whereas 1668 (77.1%) did not. Patients with perianal fistulas were characterised by the following features when compared with patients without perianal fistulas: younger age at diagnosis (23.4 vs. 25.3 years, p = 0.001), longer disease duration at enrolment (9.6 vs. 4.9 years, p < 0.001), longer disease duration at latest follow-up (17.4 vs. 11.2 years, p < 0.001), less frequenty isolated ileal disease at diagnosis (15.8% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001), more frequently rectal disease at enrolment (32.5% vs. 14.8%, p < 0.001) and latest follow-up (24.2% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.001), more frequently acne inversa (1.4% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), and more frequently intestinal resection (49.5% vs. 35.3%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of extraintestinal manifestations was not different (59.0% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.073). Compared with patients without perianal fistulas, patients with perianal fistulas were more frequently treated with topical 5-ASA (14.8% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001), systemic steroids (78.2% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001), azathioprine (82.6% vs. 77%, p = 0.008), methotrexate (28.3% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.005), infliximab (71.9% vs. 50.8%, p < 0.001), adalimumab (36% vs. 27.9%, p < 0.001), certolizumab pegol (18.6% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.001), and antibiotics (69.1% vs. 41.2%, p < 0.001). Regarding fistula anatomy, 321 patients (64.8%) had a low perianal fistula, 82 (16.6%) a high perianal fistula, and 227 (45.9%) a perineal fistula. The following fistula therapies were ever applied: perianal abscess drainage (45.7%), fistulectomy/fistulotomy (39.6%), seton drainage (28.7%), mucosal sliding flap (2%), fistula plug (1.4%), and fibrin glue instillation (1%). Conclusion In our national cohort roughly one-quarter of CD patients was diagnosed with perianal fistulizing disease. Compared with patients without perianal fistulas, patients with perianal fistulizing disease were characterised by several stigmata of complicated disease course such as a higher frequency of intestinal resections and higher prevalence of treatment with biologic agents.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.