P2243CTCA alone demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy, prognostic utility and is less expensive than CTCA combined with subsequent multi-modality functional imaging in patients with ischaemic symptoms

Abstract

Abstract Background The evaluation of suspected ischaemic symptoms incorporates multi-modality anatomical and functional imaging tests. The 2016 update to the UK's NICE guidelines recommends CT coronary angiogram (CTCA) first line in patients without known coronary artery disease. Additive multi-modality functional imaging may provide synergistic diagnostic and prognostic information. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic accuracy, prognostic utility and cost of CTCA combined with subsequent multi-modality functional testing versus (vs) CTCA alone. Methods 772 consecutive patients were referred to a single UK tertiary centre with symptoms suggestive of ischaemia. 657 individuals (“CTCA group”) underwent CTCA alone, and 115 individuals (“Combined group”) underwent CTCA and then either perfusion cardiac MRI (n=25), stress echocardiogram (n=16), or myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (n=74). Patients underwent invasive angiography (n=79) +/− revascularisation at the discretion of the referring clinician. All readers and operators were aware of previous imaging findings. Revascularised patients (n=52) were excluded from long term follow-up. The remaining patients were followed-up for a mean of 38.1±17.4 months and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) recorded. Costs were derived from the NICE guidelines. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The Combined group underwent significantly more invasive angiograms than the CTCA group (29.6% vs 6.8%, p=0.0001) with no significant difference in the rate of revascularisation (73% vs 67%, p=0.72). Mean time from CTCA to angiogram was significantly longer in the Combined group (81.2 vs 38.1 days, p=0.0001). Both sensitivity and specificity were lower in the Combined group than in the CTCA group (sensitivity: 70% vs 93%, specificity: 75% vs 100%). The rate of long term MACE was significantly higher in the Combined group (8.7% vs 2.6%, p=0.0026). Multivariate analysis of CTCA and functional imaging findings found that CTCA-derived four vessel aggregate stenosis score (0–12) was the strongest predictor of MACE for the whole cohort (OR 4.4, p<0.0001), and also for those with negative functional tests (OR 3.9, p<0.0001). Per patient, a combined strategy was more expensive than CTCA alone (£1551 vs £368, p=0.0001). CTCA and functional data vs outcomes Conclusions Combining multi-modality functional testing with CTCA increased costs but did not improve diagnostic accuracy or long term outcomes. Further reductions in both MACE and unnecessary invasive angiography are desirable; CT-derived functional data such as FFRCT may be implicated.