(P2-41) Emergency Medical Response Systems in a University Athletic Program: A Descriptive Analysis

Abstract

IntroductionUnpredictable environmental conditions, crowd dynamics, and a variety of medical emergencies create logistical and clinical obstacles when planning emergency medical response coverage for mass-gathering events. In a collaborative endeavor between a university athletics program and an academic division of Emergency Medicine, a stadium emergency medical response system was created consisting of hospital-based healthcare providers and pre-hospital healthcare providers.ObjectivesProvide descriptive statistics relevant to the nature and frequency of injury/illness, location of treatment within stadium confines, and resources used in the care of students, event staff, and spectators during collegiate football operations, to assist in future planning of mass-gathering events.MethodsA continuously updated, quality assurance database of de-identified, aggregate statistics was utilized to analyze trends regarding aspects of medical operations.ResultsDuring a 7-game home football season, there were a total of 399 patients encounters, including 1 cardiac arrest (0.25%), 12 “life-threatening” (3.01%), 121 urgent (30.33%), and 266 routine (66.67%). Total season attendance was 201,248 attendees (28,749/game and 19.83 patients encounters per 10,000 in attendance). Twenty-eight patients were transported (1.39 per 10,000), with eight resultant hospital admissions. Encounters varied by complaint, with skin (42%) comprising the largest number of encounters. Other categories included: (1) heat-related (23.5%); (2) allergic (15%); (3) neurologic (10.3%); (4) cardiopulmonary (3.5%); (5) gastrointestinal (3.6%); (6) musculoskeletal (5%); and (7) other (5%). Encounters increased noticeably when the heat index was greater than 80 °F– (29.4 vs. 10.5 per 10,000 attendees).ConclusionsThe collaborative effort by a multi-level provider model adequately covered presenting medical conditions. Consistent with previously literature, a strong correlation existed between heat index and number of patient encounters deemed urgent and routine. Interestingly, the number of “life-threatening” encounters did not appear to vary much with the heat index. Further studies of medical presentations and provider/resource utilization could provide for predictive modeling of future staffing and supply models.