P2-16-16: Nipple Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Critical Appraisal of Five Year, Single Centre Outcomes.

Abstract

Abstract Background Approximately 5,000 patients undergo breast reconstruction annually in the United Kingdom ( 2:1 ratio of immediate versus delayed respectively). Whilst skin sparing mastectomy is an accepted modality for local control in appropriately selected patients, nipple preservation remains controversial. In over 1,800 peer reviewed nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) cases, the local event rate attributable to NAC preservation following NSM (therapeutic and prophylactic) is 0.16% with no evidence of deleterious impact on disease free survival. This study aims to evaluate in a selected cohort of patients, the oncological safety and aesthetic outcome of nipple- sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). We highlight the surgical technique used and propose in/exclusion criteria. Material and Methods: Patients were identified retrospectively from our Institution's electronic patient records and WinPath™ database by searching clinical codes corresponding to NSM & IBR, performed by the senior authors (IJL and RD) between January 2004 and December 2008. Pre-operative selection criteria included: 100% pre-operative lesion characterisation; 5mm margin acceptance; submission of separate nipple core specimens for paraffin block histological assessment and re-excision of all involved/close margins. Follow-up data was verified from patients’ case notes, histo- pathological review and standardised photographic views. Endpoints include: local recurrence rate, disease free survival, peri-operative NAC subcutaneous tissue loss and validated aesthetic outcome measures. Results*: 84 patients underwent NSM & IBR for invasive disease. The mean age was 52.1 years and a median follow-up of 38 months. IBR utilised autologous tissue (latissimus dorsi or transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flaps) with/without implant prosthesis. There was one case of local recurrence (1.2%) in a patient who declined re-excision of close/involved margins and no recorded breast cancer related deaths. Peri-operative complication rates were within the national mastectomy breast reconstruction audit outcome guidelines. Conclusion: In this cohort of patients, nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction achieves comparable oncological outcomes with excellent aesthesis relative to traditional ablative procedures for local control. Nipple preservation although not evaluated independently does enhance cosmetic outcomes. *(Preliminary analysis) Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-16-16.