Abstract
Background/AimsWith the emergence of the coronavirus vaccine and the clear and important role it provides in maintaining the health of individuals and the population, it is important that our patients receive or are recommended the vaccine. We here document a case series of patients who have long-term quiescent rheumatoid arthritis who then experienced a flare of disease activity after receiving a vaccine. This information is important to understand as it allows informed discussions regarding the side effect profile of the vaccine and also the influence this may have on the patient’s disease control and future management options.MethodsPatients were reviewed in clinic as part of standard care. Individuals with rheumatoid arthritis who had experienced a flare defined as a self-reported disease activity score of > 5.1 in otherwise stable disease were noted and their response to treatment reviewed. This was a review of usual clinical practice and did not alter the treatment undertaken or monitoring of the patent. Information obtained was through the consultation with a rheumatologist and the data was collected retrospectively through review of clinical notes and clinic letters.Results Table 1 outlines the patient details and treatment responses.All flares occurred within two weeks of receiving the vaccine. Of the patients who flared, two required short-term steroid treatment; three an increase in the usual medications and one who had been in disease remission to re-start previous therapy. More patients in the Pfizer vaccine group required an escalation of usual care compared to the AstraZeneca vaccine group.ConclusionWe report six cases of rheumatoid arthritis flare soon after receipt of the coronavirus vaccine. In all, disease control was returned with minimal changes to treatment, 33% of those requiring either no treatment or an intramuscular steroid injection alone. Therefore, we recommend that clinicians should counsel patients of this potential effect, but continue to advocate the vaccine, as the risk of complications to their underlying arthritis is very low and seemingly easily treatable. P194 Table 1Antibody statusVaccine brandTime since diagnosisTime since last flareFlare after 1st or 2nd doseUsual treatmentFlare managementSeropositive, anti-CCP positiveAstraZeneca13 years3 years1stEtanercept, MethotrexateIntramuscular MethylprednisoloneSeropositive, anti-CCP positiveAstraZeneca11 years4 years1stEtanercept, SulfasalazineIntramuscular Methylprednisolone, local joint injectionSeronegative, anti-CCP negativeAstraZeneca13 years2 years1stMethotrexateIncrease methotrexate doseSeronegative, anti-CCP positivePfizer23 years11 years1stInfliximabLocal joint injection, reduce interval of infusionsSeronegative, anti-CCP positivePfizer7 years3 years2ndSulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquineIncrease Sulfasalazine doseSeropositive, anti-CCP positivePfizer7 years4 years2ndnilRe-start methotrexate, hydroxychloroquineDisclosure R.J. Hayward: None. Z. Farah: None.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Rheumatology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.