P184 Are there any ethnic differences in the response to Janus Kinase Inhibitor therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis?

Abstract

Abstract Background/Aims Baricitinib is an oral, synthetic Janus Kinase inhibitor. It has become a commonly used drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both as combination therapy and monotherapy. Previous studies have compared drug efficacy in different ethnicities, but no studies have compared the efficacy of baricitinib for the treatment of RA in different ethnicities. Given the large South Asian population in Leicestershire, we reviewed our cohort of RA patients on baricitinib to see whether there is any difference in drug response rates between the Asian and Caucasian cohorts. Methods This was a retrospective study. Patients included were those under the care of rheumatology at University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL) with a diagnosis of RA and either receiving baricitinib, or had received it in the past. Data was collected using the UHL IT systems, clinic letters, and pharmacy records. In addition to ethnicity, we reviewed patient age, gender, concurrent DMARDs used, previous biologics used, baseline and post-treatment DAS28, dropout from therapy, baseline biochemical assays (anti-CCP and RF status) and radiographic findings. Independent T-test was used to compare continuous data and the Pearson Chi-Square test was used to compare categorical data. SPSS was used to analyse the results. Results 120 patients were included in the analysis and data was analysed with PFA. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean DAS28 at baseline (Asian 5.17 vs Caucasian 4.65, p value 0.107) and post-treatment (Asian 2.83 vs Caucasian 3.33, p value 0.404) (see table 1). Comparing both ethnicities, there was no statistically significant difference in previous biologics used, the presence or absence of anti-CCP and RF, and radiographic findings of erosions. Limitations of the study include the low proportion of post treatment DAS28 values recorded and absence of data comparing primary or secondary biologic failure. Conclusion This is the first study of its kind and found no significant difference in baricitinib response between the Asian and Caucasian cohorts. Future studies are needed to evaluate this subject further. Such data is important as it can contribute to a body of evidence that may in future help inform clinical decision making. Disclosure A. Jubber: None. W.H.Z. Hussain: None. A. Moorthy: None.