P1823Aortic walls elastic properties assessment with ultrafast ultrasound imaging in case of bicuspid aortic valve

Abstract

Abstract Background Magnetic resonance imaging allows evaluation of aortic stiffness by the maximum rate of systolic distension (MRSD) a new prognosis factor of aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). MRSD requires a continuous monitoring of the aortic diameter during the cardiac cycle, not accessible to conventional echocardiography contrary to ultrafast ultrasound imaging (UF). Purpose To develop specific aortic sequences in ultrafast ultrasound imaging (UF) to provide access to the aortic MRSD Methods Tissue Doppler allowed a precise estimation of the movement of each wall and the fine variation of the aortic diameter. To automatically track the anterior and posterior aortic walls during the cardiac cycle, we developed in the laboratory a specific interface (Figure). MRSD was the maximum of the derivative of the diameter chande over time. To assess this new technique, 24 patients (10 BAV patients and 14 controls, mean age 45.8 vs. 40.7 years, p=0.464, respectively) were consecutively included at a reference center for BAV. The ascending aorta was evaluated at the sinus of Valsalva, the tubular aorta and the aortic arch with a phased array probe (Supersonic Imagine) and dedicated sequences at 2000 frames/s. Results The lab-made interface allowed to track the aortic diameter and to calculate the MRSD from the UF acquisitions for each patient. We found lower MRSD at the sinus of Valsalva in case of BAV in accordance with previously demonstrated higher stiffness at this segment by our team (Table). Table 1. UF Aortic parameters for BAV patients and controls BAV patients Controls p (Mann Whitney) Sinus of Valsalva Diameter (mm) 26.2 [22.4–32.5] 27.09 [23.5–29.5] 0.796 MRSD (s–1) 1.05 [0.73–1.19] 1.51 [1.28–1.99] 0.023 Tubular ascending aorta Diameter 31.4 [29.4–32.2] 28.9 [22.6–31.5] 0.328 MRSD 0.94 [0.59–1.27] 1.09 [0.87–1.41] 0.353 Aortic arch Diameter 24.2 [23.7–24.8] 24.2 [18.9–24.5] 0.673 MRSD 0.57 [0.35–1.07] 0.85 [0.76–1.02] 0.257 Results are median [25th–75th percentile]. Figure 1 Conclusion UF allows evaluation of aortic stiffness by MRSD using dedicated sequence and interface. As echocardiography, UF is easily accessible and therefore deserves attention from cardiologists taking care of BAV patients to evaluate the segmental aortic remodeling associated with BAV.