P18.08.B COMPARISON OF DOSE CALCULATION PLANNING SYSTEMS FOR RECCURENT MENENGIOMA TREATED WITH FRACTIONATED RE-IRRIDATION

Abstract

Abstract PURPOSE Meningioma is among the most common tumors of the central nervous system, accounting for approximately one-third of all brain tumors. Surgery is mainstay treatment and Radiotherapy (RT) provides long-term control in many patients, however recurrences following RT may occur and the safety and efficacy of a second course of RT is not well defined, technical and planning features are yet to be clarified. In this study, we compared various treatment planning systems (TPS) used in RT in a patient who had progressed meningioma after three applications of Gammaknife radiosurgery (GK-SRS). Case Presentation: 55-year-old male patient was diagnosed with grade-1 meningioma of the sphenoid wing in 2014 and subtotal excision was performed, with no further treatment. Progression was detected in 2016, and 11 Gy single fraction GK-SRS was applied in two sessions (inferior and superior parts of the tumor was irradiated in separate GK-SRS applications with 2 months apart) to the recurrent lesion in the right spheno-orbital region in a GK center. Patient was well until June 2022 when progression was detected in the right infratemporal region. Another GK-SRS application of 11 Gy was performed to the patient at the same institute.In April 2023 progression of the tumor was detected, tumor was irresectable and patient referred to our department for fractionated radiotherapy. Recurrent tumor was originating from right sfenoid wing and extending to right infratemporal fossa. We obtained the radiation dose distributions from the previous GK-SRS plans. Due to dose limits on the right optic nerve due to previous radiation dose disturbution , the conventional fractionated radiotherapy was planned . The PTV dose was planned to be 45 Gy/25 fx. Eclipse and Brainlab systems were compared for treatment planning. Right optic nerve dose of EQD2 was already above the limits, thus conventional fractionation (45 Gyin 25 fractions) was prescribed. Two separate plans were generated using Varian-Eclipse and Brainlab-Elements TPS, and the dose distribution of those plans were compared. Plan optimization was performed in both planning systems to provide PTV D%95. While the PTV Dmax was 57.24 Gy in BrainLAB, it was 48.7 Gy in Eclipse. Dmax doses for Brainlab and Eclipse were: right optic nerve 10.11 Gy vs. 26.9 Gy, chiasm 6.68 Gy vs. 20.5 Gy respectively. In Eclipse plan optimization, the collimator and table angles were optimized manually, while in Brainlab planning system, they were automatically handled, therefore normal tissues can be better preserved with increase of hot spots inside the PTV. This situation is observed clearly in this case. CONCLUSION Using different table and collimator angles in plan optimization can yield better results in providing normal tissue dose tolerance, especially in the irradiation of central nervous system.