Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims With the increase in the line expectancy of chronic kidney disease in the older population (>60 years), the numbers requiring haemodialysis is progressively rising. The elderly population may be different from the younger in terms of non-suitable vessels for access creation, non-maturation, and vascular calcifications, and this may alter the outcomes of use of arteriovenous fistula (AVF). This study was conducted to analyse the outcomes of AVF in elderly patients (>60 years). Method Retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Nephrology at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi. Patients of more than 60 years of age in whom AVF was created from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2016 were included in the study. Follow-up data of 3.5 years was analysed. The primary endpoint was to assess primary and secondary patency rates. Results A total of 300 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 63.8 years. Radiocephalic AVF (RCAVF) was the most common site of [69.8% (n = 210)], followed by brachiocephalic (BCAVF) in 25.2% (n = 75) and basilic vein transposition (BVT) in 5% (n = 15). At 12 months, overall survival of the AVF was 66.8%. At 42 months, the primary patency rate of RCAVF, BCAVF, and BVT was 50.6%, 52.6%, and 50.4% respectively. The commonest cause of access failure was thrombosis (20.4%) followed by non-maturation (9%). Vascular access abandonment was found least in BCAVF. Conclusion AVF remains the preferred vascular access for haemodialysis in the elderly population. Brachiocephalic AVF has higher primary and secondary patency rates. Thrombosis and failure of maturation are major concerns in the elderly AVF.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.