Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), it has a 5 year survival rate of around 60-70% and around 50% patients become refractory to treatment or relapse subsequently. Those with relapsed or refractory disease are treated with salvage chemotherapy, using agents different from those used in upfront therapy, followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT). Around 30-40% of those with relapse or refractory disease who are consolidated with HDT-ASCT after first salvage chemotherapy suffer from relapse. It is a common practice to treat patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL, with up to 2 lines of salvage chemotherapy. This study analyzes treatment responses and outcomes with respect to progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) to second salvage chemotherapy in relapsed and/or refractory DLBCL. This was a retrospective analysis of 55 patients of non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated at SKMCH&RC over the span of 25 years, including 55 patients who received gemcitabine based chemotherapy as second salvage regimen. A total of 35 out of 55 patients (63%) patients received GDP 1-6 cycles of GDP with an average number of 3 cycles for each patient. Out of these 35 patients, 22 (63%) were alive at the time of analysis and 8 patients (23%) had died while 5 (14%) had lost to follow up. Our study proves that, in our part of world where rituximab is not available to every patient because of cost limitations, second salvage Gemcitabine based chemotherapy (Gemcitabine/Dexamethasone/Cisplatin) still has a role improving disease free and overall survival.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.