Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an effective treatment for aortic stenosis (AS) in high-risk patients, such as those who are suffering ESRD on hemodialysis. We previously showed that long-term survival of hemodialysis patients underwent TAVI was lower than that of non-hemodialysis patients but was comparable with that of hemodialysis patients treated with surgical aortic valve replacement. It is known that hemodialysis is a high risk of the bioprosthetic structural valve deterioration (SVD) after valve replacement surgery. Consistently, higher incidence of re-TAVI operation due to restenosis was observed in hemodialysis patients than in non-hemodialysis patients (Odds ratio [OR]:29.4, p<0.001). In this study, we aimed to identify predictors of SVD in post-TAVI hemodialysis patients. Method From April 2012 to December 2015, 24 patients on hemodialysis were selected to receive TAVI for the treatment of AS in Osaka University Hospital. Demographic and laboratory data at pre- and post-operation were compared between patients who underwent re-TAVI (valve-in-valve) (SVD group) and those who did not (no-SVD group). Results During the follow-up period (maximal 7 years), 4 out of 24 patients required re-TAVI (valve-in-valve) operation because of SVD. Although serum calcium, phosphate, and PTH levels before operation were comparable between SVD group and no-SVD group, serum magnesium levels were significantly lower in SVD group. Lower serum magnesium quartiles were associated with a higher risk of SVD (OR 5.83, p=0.036). While effective orifice area index (EOAi) of aortic valve at 1 week after TAVI was similar between the 2 groups, EOAi improvement at 1 month was significantly poorer in SVD group than in no-SVD group (1.70 ± 0.15 vs 2.50 ± 0.56, p = 0.049). Conclusion The higher incidence of re-TAVI due to SVD in hemodialysis patients could be related with pre-operative low magnesium levels and with one-month post-operative low EOAi improvement. This was a single center observational study, and the number of patients was very small so that our data would not be necessarily applicable for every patient. Further investigation is necessary for identifying a prognostic predictor of SVD, which will lead to the prevention of unfavorable re-operation in hemodialysis patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call