P105: Pre-Emptive Use of Mechanical Circulatory support in sudden cardiac death- A contrasting case series

Abstract

Life-threatening ventricular tachycardia(VT) and fibrillation(VF) are the most important causes of sudden cardiac death(SCD). Patients who survive are often predisposed to recurrent VT secondary to scar tissue and require definitive ablation therapies. However given the unpredictable nature of arrhythmias, patients can degenerate into VT storm even as outpatient and become hemodynamically unstable which precludes ablation therapies. Using preemptive mechanical circulatory support in such patients as a bridge to ablation can be a game changer, especially in the event of a fresh VT. We present two contrasting cases, where preemptive use of Impella showed better outcomes in neurological status post cardiac arrest. Our patient is a 16-year-old competitive basketball player who suffered an out-of-hospital VT arrest during match practice requiring bystander CPR and multiple shocks. He was stabilized in an outside hospital and brought to us intubated, paralyzed, on multiple pressors and maintained on IV amiodarone and lidocaine. ECHO demonstrated a very large right ventricle (RV) with severe left ventricle(LV) dysfunction, ejection fraction(EF) 10-15% with basal RV diameter 6.8cm. Cardiac MRI(CMRI) showed an area of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of the RV-free wall near the apex. Endomyocardial biopsy, Cardiac catheterization, and CT angiogram were unremarkable. With improvement in volume status, he was weaned off all inotropes and antiarrhythmics, received an AICD, and maintained only on sotalol and lisinopril. On outpatient follow-up, repeat CMRI confirmed Arrhythmogenic RV dysplasia. Unfortunately, four months later, the patient had another episode of cardiac arrest secondary to a VT storm with 20 minutes of downtime. He was deemed too unstable for VT ablation and thus emergently underwent a stellate ganglion block. The patient remained encephalopathic post-cardiac arrest with very slow neurologic recovery. He subsequently underwent cardiac transplantation The second case is that of a 63-year-old male with a past medical history of nonischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF of 10% status post-ICD placement, and VT on amiodarone who presented with episodes of monomorphic VT followed by ICD shocks and syncope. Heart catheterization showed diffuse three-vessel disease. Due to recurrent VT patients, he received an Impella CP as a bridge to VT ablation. Interestingly during ablation, the patient goes into cardiac arrest requiring CPR for 90 minutes. He had successful VT ablation and with no neurological deficit post-procedure. Multiple trials have shown an improved 30-day survival rate without neurological sequelae with early implantation of Impella during ongoing CPR for cardiac arrest. Impella has several favorable properties by unloading the LV which limits the infarct size and maintains cerebral perfusion during the arrest. Preemptive Impella use is often used as a bridge to transplant, however using it as a bridge to ablation is yet to gain prominence.